TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Proposal for Twitter to move inactive accounts to cold-archive instead of purge

2 点作者 sysihyk大约 2 年前
As Twitter is ruminating about deleting inactive accounts again, I want to share here about a proposal which was part of a university thesis, with some improvements based on current context.<p>The inactive accounts, in this proposal, will be moved to a cold archive after a prolonged period of inactivity, ranging from 6 months to two years. The cold archive consist of:<p>1. A separate subdomain from main Twitter. Example archive.twitter.com or limbo.twitter.com<p>2. While accounts retain their original usernames as part of archive usernames, their mainspace usernames will be freed up. Discord-style number discriminators may be used so to prevent archive username exhaustion, although keeping their names intact during the process is ideal.<p>3. If an archived account is accessed, there will be a prompt to ask whether to restore to mainspace or leave it as it is. In the case of the former, their mainspace usernames are usually restored, but if someone else has taken up the slot then they have to choose a new username.<p>4. Past search histories that are related to the account is deleted upon archiving.<p>5. While as in normal mode, tweets and users can be browsed through its internal search engine, a robots.txt will forbid Google and other bots to index any and all contents of the archive subdomain. Exceptions only apply to Internet Archive&#x27;s bots.<p>Edit: In response to the frame challenge below, this is my take as to why. Originally posted as a reply comment but somehow it didn&#x27;t show up.<p>Many old Twitter accounts have value, either objective or subjective&#x2F;sentimental (deceased relative&#x2F;friend). Besides, there are a lot of contents, tapestries and so on that accumulated at Twitter over a long time recording the evolution of culture in general.<p>If they move forward with the purge the following will be lost:<p>1. Accounts whose owners are alive but not be able to log in for any reasons, such as being on military active duty, jailed (can be wrongful - look up the Innocence Project), or under total or partial internet blackout like Myanmar or Kashmir.<p>2. Tweets from now deceased users related to major upheavals such as the Arab Spring - extremely important and valuable for anyone looking into the topic.<p>3. Fictional works. Often there are so many &quot;roleplay&quot; accounts or otherwise which was active for a short duration just to act out of its fiction, but has since gone dormant.<p>I can&#x27;t but to think of Margaret Atwood&#x27;s &quot;The Testaments&quot; especially about the &quot;loss of internet history in the latter chapters set in a 22th century symposium.

2 条评论

BulgarianIdiot大约 2 年前
You, who wrote this here, spend more time and resources coming up with it, than Elon has time and resources to allocate for implementing it, after firing 90% of the company. It won&#x27;t happen. He wants to free up space, and sell the names, with minimum effort involved. That&#x27;s all.<p>Twitter is being dismantled and sold for parts.
评论 #35868372 未加载
评论 #35868869 未加载
uberman大约 2 年前
Frame challenge : Why would accounts ever need to be archived?
评论 #35867412 未加载