Am I missing something here? The article opens with<p>> a city where most or all amenities (grocery stores, pharmacies, entertainment, public services) are within a 15-minute walk or bike ride<p>and then spends the rest of the article talking as if you'd never leave those 15 miniute neighborhoods and that you have to work there too.<p>Feels like the author really doesn't agree with the concept but doesn't want to say so; their argument seems quite bad-faith to me.