TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The open-source AI boom is built on Big Tech’s handouts. How long will it last?

20 点作者 solalf大约 2 年前

4 条评论

armchairhacker大约 2 年前
Big Tech is built on open-source handouts.<p>And open-source being built on Big Tech&#x27;s research and models doesn&#x27;t mean it <i>relies</i> on them. See: the many papers published by Standford and co. which rival OpenAI&#x27;s research, RedPajama (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.together.xyz&#x2F;blog&#x2F;redpajama" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.together.xyz&#x2F;blog&#x2F;redpajama</a>) which rivals LLaMa. And these are built with open alternatives, there&#x27;d be more motivation without.<p>Big Tech has the advantage of compute and resources, but it&#x27;s probable that open-source has the advantage of research. Since companies may have a few very talented individuals, but open-source has way more people and includes academia.
nr2x大约 2 年前
These tools are the result of academic work, funded by the government for decades, and by user content, also generated for decades.<p>Corporate AI is just 90% selling back public goods at a markup. They should be legally forced to open source.
评论 #35935166 未加载
ksaj大约 2 年前
The data that the models are built from comes from the public. It&#x27;ll be a long fight if Big Tech decides that the public&#x27;s data, however referenced in whatever model, is no longer the public&#x27;s.<p>They&#x27;re fully welcome to keep proprietary the data that is already proprietary. But so far, that&#x27;s not been their source.
dmbche大约 2 年前
From the horses mouth <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semianalysis.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;google-we-have-no-moat-and-neither" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semianalysis.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;google-we-have-no-moat-and-ne...</a>