TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What's your favorite GPT powered tool?

263 点作者 surrTurr大约 2 年前
There have been many tools powered by GPTs coming out over the past few months. Too many. Which ones are actually worth using?

80 条评论

sgt大约 2 年前
Am I the only one who isn&#x27;t using ChatGPT on a regular basis?<p>Though I&#x27;ve made a few attempts to use it, generally I already know the answers to most trivial questions. And by going into more complex questions and scenarios, it becomes apparent that ChatGPT lacks a deep understanding of the suggestions it provides. It turns out to be a pretty frustrating experience.<p>Also I&#x27;ve noticed that by the time I&#x27;ve crafted intricate prompts, I could have easily skimmed through a few pages of official docs and found a solution.<p>That said, considering the widespread buzz surrounding ChatGPT, it&#x27;s entirely possible that I may simply be using it incorrectly.
评论 #35948139 未加载
评论 #35948277 未加载
评论 #35947557 未加载
评论 #35947602 未加载
评论 #35947840 未加载
评论 #35947504 未加载
评论 #35947578 未加载
评论 #35947797 未加载
评论 #35952534 未加载
评论 #35954526 未加载
评论 #36001796 未加载
评论 #35951705 未加载
评论 #35947499 未加载
评论 #35947715 未加载
评论 #35952915 未加载
评论 #35948255 未加载
评论 #35952741 未加载
评论 #35970255 未加载
评论 #35948252 未加载
评论 #35947492 未加载
评论 #35947519 未加载
评论 #35956350 未加载
lonelos大约 2 年前
Phind is a GPT powered search engine optimized for developers &#x2F; technical documentation. It searches the web and tries to aggregate results from multiple web sites. Although there are instances where it references outdated versions of libraries, on balance, it significantly reduced my time spent on technical research.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35947312 未加载
评论 #35946649 未加载
评论 #35948608 未加载
评论 #35947710 未加载
评论 #35950372 未加载
评论 #35951049 未加载
评论 #35955501 未加载
评论 #35949527 未加载
评论 #35961794 未加载
paulgb大约 2 年前
I built a tool that gives GPT a Docker container to run commands in to accomplish a particular task. I find myself using it for things like simple file conversions (it mounts the current working directory into the container). It can install software in the container so it’s like a chatbot with the entire apt universe at its disposal.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;drifting-in-space&#x2F;botsh">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;drifting-in-space&#x2F;botsh</a>
评论 #35947230 未加载
bartkappenburg大约 2 年前
So, everyone&#x27;s favorite is the one they built themselves?
评论 #35946937 未加载
评论 #35950291 未加载
评论 #35946933 未加载
评论 #35947086 未加载
评论 #35949056 未加载
评论 #35947151 未加载
评论 #35947141 未加载
评论 #35959357 未加载
linsomniac大约 2 年前
(apparently) Unpopular opinion: It&#x27;s pretty cool that there are so many &quot;look what I made&quot; responses here. This feels like what happens in a renaissance; there aren&#x27;t the tools so people are making their own. It might also be demonstrating that the tools are helping to speed innovation, allowing people to &quot;punch above their weight&quot;.
评论 #35953051 未加载
yawnxyz大约 2 年前
I use Phind.com + co-pilot + GPT-4 to write code daily. I just tried using Bard for summarizing my blog post as it has a larger context window than GPT-4 and it worked really well, so I&#x27;m adding that to my workflow.<p>Separately I like combining serper.dev and Scrapingbee with GPT-4 &#x2F; langchain to summarizing scientific articles and news for me on top of my (ugly non-sharable) AI scripts, but they&#x27;re basic
评论 #35959659 未加载
setgree大约 2 年前
I am using ChatGPT to convert some very brittle tidyverse (R) code into base R, and it’s outstanding. I could finally learn (and then try to remember) all of R’s conventions but it’s a lot more pleasurable to have the chatbot actually do the converting from ideas into code.<p>The context is that I am someone who codes in intense bursts every few months, so a lot of the details never really transition from short-term to long-term memory. ChatGPT is perfect for this.
softwaredoug大约 2 年前
Just ChatGPT itself. It’s my therapist, stackoverflow, Wikipedia, and many other things. Best $20&#x2F;month I’ve ever spent.<p>I’m skeptical of most prompt-based tools. I’d rather just get to the source and tweak ChatGPT to talk about <i>exactly</i> what I want.
评论 #35959416 未加载
评论 #36061118 未加载
评论 #35949192 未加载
bioxept大约 2 年前
Raycast AI (now Raycast Pro). It makes using GPT more accessible and user-friendly by bringing it right to where you need it. Also their take on AI Commands is quite useful. You can create commands with a custom prompt and the prompt will additionally contain the currently selected text.<p>Some example AI commands that are built in (you can of course create your own commands): - Improve Writing - Change Tone to Friendly &#x2F; Confident &#x2F; Professional &#x2F; Casual - Fix Spelling and Grammar - Find Bugs in Code - Explain Code Step by Step - Explain This in Simple Terms<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.raycast.com&#x2F;pro">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.raycast.com&#x2F;pro</a>
评论 #35948907 未加载
Nathanwl大约 2 年前
Havana summarizes my sales calls and drafts a follow-up email automatically after each call.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tryhavana.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tryhavana.com</a><p>When you do more than 5-10 sales calls a week, writing up notes and emails can take hours of your time.<p>It&#x27;s tedious work but also must be done (otherwise you might forget what&#x27;s going on in a deal when it&#x27;s time to do another call down the line!).<p>Also, the quality of the summaries and emails must be good (clear, readable) but not necessarily great (we&#x27;re not looking to win a Pulitzer here).<p>It&#x27;s the perfect kind of task for GPT.
评论 #35956715 未加载
评论 #35957459 未加载
评论 #35950499 未加载
评论 #35999702 未加载
评论 #35959022 未加载
评论 #35958591 未加载
评论 #35970465 未加载
api大约 2 年前
My favorite thing to use ChatGPT for is a personal tutor. I&#x27;ve been able, for my own intellectual interest, to educate myself about some topics in math and CS that have so far eluded me. The descriptions it generates are better than anything I&#x27;ve found elsewhere and if it&#x27;s not clear I can say things like &quot;explain the above for an audience with a background in computer programming&quot; and it will re-attempt the explanation.<p>Rather ironically I&#x27;m using ChatGPT to teach me about AI, explaining concepts like tensors and attention layers. It&#x27;s a great way to make sure I&#x27;m in good with Roko&#x27;s Basilisk since my AI-generated immortal soul will be able to cite my ChatGPT log as proof that I helped bring the Basilisk into existence.
underlines大约 2 年前
There are so many useful tools, that I keep an Awesome list up to date with openAI API, as well as open LLM tools. Especially the up to date list of open LLM models might be of interest to some, in case someone wants to be independent of OpenAI:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;underlines&#x2F;awesome-marketing-datascience&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;awesome-ai.md">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;underlines&#x2F;awesome-marketing-datascience&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #36056231 未加载
评论 #35947114 未加载
bluecoconut大约 2 年前
For GPT&#x2F;Copilot style help for pandas, in notebooks REPL flow (without needing to install plugins), I built sketch. I genuinely use it every-time I&#x27;m working on pandas dataframes for a quick one-off analysis. Just makes the iteration loop so much faster. (Specifically the `.sketch.howto`, anecdotally I actually don&#x27;t use `.sketch.ask` anymore)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;approximatelabs&#x2F;sketch">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;approximatelabs&#x2F;sketch</a>
lbeurerkellner大约 2 年前
We are building a programming language (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lmql.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lmql.ai</a>), that allows you to execute programs with control-flow and constrained behavior on top of LLMs. Essentially imperative LLM text generation.
评论 #35947099 未加载
neom大约 2 年前
Not sure what they&#x27;re using under the hood but so far kagi has the best summarizer I&#x27;ve used:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kagi.com&#x2F;summarizer&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kagi.com&#x2F;summarizer&#x2F;index.html</a><p>Also +1 for ChatPDF - it&#x27;s great!
momentmaker大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been using a combination of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;labs.kagi.com&#x2F;fastgpt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;labs.kagi.com&#x2F;fastgpt</a> and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;</a> on a daily basis basically replacing all search engines.<p>Also a plug for a weekly AI-related digest: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;perprompt.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;perprompt.com&#x2F;</a>
ensocode大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;</a> Like ChatGPT but what sets it apart from other AI chatbots is its ability to display the source of the information it provides.
评论 #35946621 未加载
评论 #35946942 未加载
riwsky大约 2 年前
My favorite GPT-powered tool is Todd, this guy at my work
评论 #36029546 未加载
predictand大约 2 年前
I am more than a bit biased, but Heuristi.ca is my favorite tool for knowledge exploration using a mind-map like layout that uses the ChatGPT API.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;heuristi.ca&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;heuristi.ca&#x2F;</a>
huydotnet大约 2 年前
I built <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chatuml.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chatuml.com</a>, a copilot for diagram, the main usecase is when you need to start a diagram but don&#x27;t know where to start, you can just type out what you have in mind and let AI do the work:<p>&gt; Alice give Bob 5 dollars. Bob give Fred 10 dollar. Fred buy a house. Alice rent Fred&#x27;s house. Alice pay Fred 500 dollar....
评论 #35949393 未加载
alfanick大约 2 年前
So far I created a small Tampermonkey script [0] to generate me [realistic] off-&#x2F;on-water rowing workouts based on a prompt. I use it almost daily.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;alfanick&#x2F;3ecac79f9590bae6819e410c33878774" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;alfanick&#x2F;3ecac79f9590bae6819e410c338...</a>
ChildOfChaos大约 2 年前
I&#x27;m still trying to find a good work flow.<p>But I like to ask Bing questions, if i have a simple thought of &#x27;what does this mean&#x27; or &#x27;how does this work&#x27; to get a high level overview of something that is not vital that I know everything, it&#x27;s just something I heard and realised I had no idea about what it was&#x2F;how it worked.<p>And i&#x27;ve started using heypi.com as a personal coach, just talking through anything I am feeling&#x2F;struggling with and i&#x27;m really liking that at the moment. I&#x27;ve felt for the longest time I could do with someone to bounce ideas around or talk to about life and struggled to find someone that understood my nonsense and overthinking, AI seems to be a good job with it and i don&#x27;t have to worry about being insecure with what I am talking about as it&#x27;s just an AI.
评论 #35949126 未加载
armajid大约 2 年前
Sindre Sorhus released this list:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;sindresorhus&#x2F;awesome-chatgpt">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;sindresorhus&#x2F;awesome-chatgpt</a>
anotherpaulg大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been experimenting with using ChatGPT for coding and building up some useful tooling.<p>The result is aider, which is a command-line tool that allows you to code with GPT-4 in the terminal. Ask GPT for features, improvements, or bug fixes and aider will directly apply the suggested changes to your source files. Each change is automatically committed to git with a descriptive commit message.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paul-gauthier.github.io&#x2F;aider&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paul-gauthier.github.io&#x2F;aider&#x2F;</a><p>It helps to look at some chat transcripts, to get a sense of what it&#x27;s like to actually code with GPT:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paul-gauthier.github.io&#x2F;aider&#x2F;examples&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paul-gauthier.github.io&#x2F;aider&#x2F;examples&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35987727 未加载
评论 #35949202 未加载
Closi大约 2 年前
The Playground tool for ChatGPT 4 in the API documentation site.<p>It&#x27;s like ChatGPT but gives you the option to change &#x2F; edit and rerun prompts more effectively.
grepfru_it大约 2 年前
I have been using LLMs to automatically repair security vulnerabilities. I have a set of tools which build prompts describing the environment and the output of vulnerability scans. The tool then requests a shell script to disable&#x2F;fix&#x2F;update the vulnerability. The script is submitted as a PR which has actions that run integration tests. Human intervention is sometimes needed, but the focus is on better engineering of prompts (and by proxy tooling).<p>Describing the environment relies heavily on a CMDB, so this is not a one-size-fits-all approach and this is functioning entirely in my personal lab of ~100 servers. That said, ChatGPT has given me the best results compared to locally run LLMs
nailer大约 2 年前
Just plain old bing.<p>Getting answers has replaced using search in about 80% of cases.<p>- how do i run a function when a value changes in svelte?<p>- how do i get the current tab id from inside a content script?<p>- what is the origin of the term &#x27;use your illusion&#x27;?<p>- what is the average salary of a developer advocate in new york city?
oersted大约 2 年前
MirrorThink is able to search and read scientific papers to answer serious scientific questions and find solutions to deep engineering problems.<p>It is also GPT-4 for free (for now).<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mirrorthink.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mirrorthink.ai&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35947479 未加载
评论 #35947122 未加载
评论 #35980314 未加载
unsupp0rted大约 2 年前
Not sure if it&#x27;s GPT-powered, but I now get all my news from <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;newsminimalist.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;newsminimalist.com</a><p>It&#x27;s so calm and to the point, I&#x27;m never going back to anything else.
评论 #35946890 未加载
评论 #35947147 未加载
评论 #35949273 未加载
评论 #35949291 未加载
deathmonger5000大约 2 年前
Promptr is a coding assistant tool that allows you to ask GPT to produce or modify code, and the results will be automatically applied to your file system.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ferrislucas&#x2F;promptr">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ferrislucas&#x2F;promptr</a><p>From the README: Promptr is a CLI tool that makes it easy to apply GPT&#x27;s code change recommendations with a single command. With Promptr, you can quickly refactor code, implement classes to pass tests, and experiment with LLMs. No more copying code from the ChatGPT window into your editor.
评论 #35948918 未加载
stared大约 2 年前
Ones that actually save me a lot of time I would otherwise spend googling:<p>plz-cli, a terminal copilot (not just an autocomplete - you can ask it to explain, refactor, or well - do anything), <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;m1guelpf&#x2F;plz-cli">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;m1guelpf&#x2F;plz-cli</a><p>Code GPT, a Visual Studio Code copilot, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;marketplace.visualstudio.com&#x2F;items?itemName=DanielSanMedium.dscodegpt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;marketplace.visualstudio.com&#x2F;items?itemName=DanielSa...</a>
none2022大约 2 年前
Its Bing Chat for me. Its free and I get GPT4. I don&#x27;t expect this to last forever though. I haven&#x27;t seen any ads and am wondering how long Microsoft will subsidize my daily habit
camjohnson26大约 2 年前
Short Circuit adds ChatGPT to Siri, really shows what Siri could be. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shortcircuit.chat&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shortcircuit.chat&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35952111 未加载
louismerlin大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been really enjoying this add-on for Google Workspace. Plus, it&#x27;s made by an irl friend of mine :)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gpt.space" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gpt.space</a>
debitcredit大约 2 年前
I built op. An Excel + Jupyter Notebooks + GPT tool for working with python pandas dataframes.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opapp.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opapp.io&#x2F;</a>
rliy001大约 2 年前
I have been using it as a code companion getting it to do some dirty work that I would have had to ask Google and wade through results and find a &quot;similar example to what I&#x27;m trying to achieve, then having to apply it to my situation.<p>Instead I can describe my precise situation to ChatGTP and get something that is almost 95% ready to plug in straight to my code.<p>I will give an example.<p>I work on asp.net, heavy sql backend application. Sometimes while I am working on a big task, I skip a few things as I develop and hone in on my ultimate solution. Then I go back and tidy things up. I would sometimes mock data that I would have had to write onto real sql tables into temporary tables and at the end, I would go and turn those temp tables into real tables. ChatGPT has been very good at say turning those temporary (staging) work into real work<p>e.g. Hey ChatGTP, here&#x27;s my settings table which I have defined as a temporary table, can you write me a script that turns this into the real table, and another script for the data import script<p>e.g. Hey chatGTP, I need to output this xml from this sql, can you have a go at turning this into something like this, here&#x27;s the table schema I&#x27;m working with
评论 #35960537 未加载
mooreds大约 2 年前
I&#x27;m really interested in a tool that can ingest documentation (I have it in markdown and asciidoc) and help me write new documentation. Any suggestions?
评论 #35982097 未加载
评论 #35955725 未加载
bemmu大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ll mention one which I didn&#x27;t write, which I found pretty cool.<p>iOS app &quot;Friday&quot; lets you use to talk to ChatGPT. It seems to be just simple glue (I&#x27;m sure there are many similar ones) between speech recognition, GPT, and text-to-speech, but the end result is that when you&#x27;re bored you can have fun discussions without typing.
评论 #35972440 未加载
brylie大约 2 年前
The GrammarlyGO LLM makes an already essential writing companion even better. I’m now drafting new content and expanding ideas all in GrammarlyGO. It even checks the grammar and style of the LLM output!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.grammarly.com&#x2F;grammarlygo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.grammarly.com&#x2F;grammarlygo</a>
ftxbro大约 2 年前
As someone with access to the Air Force Donovan LLM tools with Scale, I personally think their SKD (Sentient Killer Drones) tool is one to keep an eye on for the future. Imagine Sydney but she&#x27;s mad at you and she knows where you live and she&#x27;s embodied in a high tech drone packed with explosives.
评论 #35947622 未加载
tin7in大约 2 年前
Copilot, then <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;</a> and I am biased but the one that I am working on - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;saga.so&#x2F;ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;saga.so&#x2F;ai</a> for integrated GPT inside notes and tasks.
jamesbfb大约 2 年前
As a developer who works with a lesser known ERP (Odoo, which famously has a terrible level of _good_ technical documentation online), PyCharm&#x2F;co-pilot continues to blow my mind with how well it interprets my workflow when building out code.<p>It also does a relatively good job of writing unit tests.
heliophobicdude大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been using the api in S-GPT [1]. An iOS shortcut that I use to primarily summarize the body text content of a webpage I&#x27;m on from the share-sheet. When it can fit the text in the context, I&#x27;m pretty happy with the the results.<p>It also supports sending it your clipboard contents when you launch it and it parses the words &quot;clipboard&quot;. Good for when in a pinch.<p>I mapped some repetitive prompts to my text replacement on my phone that auto-expand when I type in the input field `*&lt;some shortcut here&gt;`<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.macstories.net&#x2F;ios&#x2F;introducing-s-gpt-a-shortcut-to-connect-openais-chatgpt-with-native-features-of-apples-operating-systems&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.macstories.net&#x2F;ios&#x2F;introducing-s-gpt-a-shortcut-...</a>
SteveMorin大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;type.ai">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;type.ai</a> It has embedded GPT4 in a way that more natural for long form content.<p>Have tried about another 7 ai text generators&#x2F;editors and so far is the best
mg大约 2 年前
I am running this tool to compare free and open LLMs:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gnod.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gnod.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;ai</a><p>So far I know of 3:<p>- Phind<p>- Perplexity<p>- YouChat<p>If you know more, let me know and I&#x27;ll add them.
oriettaxx大约 2 年前
I am on <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com</a> the whole day: it&#x27;s everything I need<p>but I know nothing about who made it, can any of you help?
评论 #35953124 未加载
rawsh大约 2 年前
DankGPT is able to draw context from a library of documents (textbook, papers, class slides) to explain any topic and answer complicated reasoning problems.<p>It’s very similar to ChatPDF, but you can include multiple documents and it has much better context selection. This leads to better answers in practice (less “the source does not contain information on…” and hallucinations)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dankgpt.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dankgpt.com</a>
onurgenes大约 2 年前
I am dogfooding the tool I made for cold emails cold Nureply. Basically it helps me to do marketing for Nureply by using Nureply.<p>I am mostly a technical person and not the best for selling&#x2F;marketing. So I built Nureply to help me meet with potential customers and learn from them directly.<p>Take a look at here -&gt; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nureply.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nureply.com</a>
ezedv大约 2 年前
TranscribeMe is my favourite (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;transcribeme.app);" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;transcribeme.app);</a> it transcribes voice notes from WhatsApp and Telegram. Not only that, if you have a long voice note, the bot summarizes it with an AI. You can also add ChatGPT to those message apps
asmr大约 2 年前
Not necessarily OpenAI GPT powered, but local LLMs have gotten pretty good over the past few weeks. I am most interested in using an LLM for automation with tools like AutoGPT and Godmode.space.<p>I prefer using an LLM locally if possible since it gives me more control and I don&#x27;t have to worry about the additional cost or OpenAIs infrastructure being under load.
jingxiangmo大约 2 年前
As a continuation to this thread, for anyone interested, here&#x27;s the link to a Discord community for developing and sharing GPT&#x2F;AI tools to enhance everyday life:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discord.gg&#x2F;579renpEPn" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discord.gg&#x2F;579renpEPn</a>
lonelyasacloud大约 2 年前
Besides ChatGPT, I&#x27;m getting enough added value from CoPilot and Grammarly to make them worth paying for.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;</a> is favourite &quot;search&quot; tool (ironically beating GPT enhanced Bing) for outright speed and quality of results.
评论 #35950918 未加载
11001100大约 2 年前
I think ChatPDF is worth to be mentioned, but I haven&#x27;t had a chance to use this tool yet:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.chatpdf.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.chatpdf.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=35626312" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=35626312</a>
brylie大约 2 年前
I’ve been getting great results from Notion AI. I like how the LLM is integrated into an already powerful knowledge management tool. It makes it easier to iterate on ideas and learn new concepts.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.notion.so&#x2F;product&#x2F;ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.notion.so&#x2F;product&#x2F;ai</a>
raamdev大约 2 年前
News Minimalist:<p>&gt; It uses AI (ChatGPT-4) to read the top 1000 news every day and rank them by significance on a scale from 0 to 10 based on event magnitude, scale, potential, and source credibility.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newsminimalist.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newsminimalist.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35946787 未加载
josh7大约 2 年前
Currently I love using <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imagetocaption.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imagetocaption.ai</a> for my social media posts. Creates nice captions for my photography page out of my images.
uwe_dreiss大约 2 年前
Not using AI tools too much at the moment, but probably ChatGPT is my number 1 tool right now. Playing around with the OpenAI API at the moment to launch some of my own micro projects soon though.
chintler大约 2 年前
I&#x27;d like to recommend ekatra.one, a GPT-powered education platform designed for under-served learners, especially in India. Helps with personalized learning experiences and uses WhatsApp for course delivery.
SamPatt大约 2 年前
If you have an OpenAI key, and want to share access with someone else, or enjoy having a joint AI role-playing session:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;havewords.ai&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;havewords.ai&#x2F;</a>
jamesmurdza大约 2 年前
I&#x27;m working on a tool which creates git repos and PRs from instructions: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gitwit.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gitwit.dev&#x2F;</a>
AISnakeOil大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve found Bard to be extremely useful, more so than ChatGPT. It&#x27;s internet capabilities is a small but super important change.<p>You can pass it a URL and perform actions on the webpage.
arnaimbd大约 2 年前
Definitely Notion-AI (technology powered by OpenAI). It replaces other tools, including Writesonic, Wordtune, etc.<p>Additionally, OpenAI Chat is a useful tool for day-to-day tasks.
southwesterly大约 2 年前
I’m using the Bing one at the moment to write background on articles. And it helps me generate D&amp;D character back stories and campaign plots.
juujian大约 2 年前
shell_gpt is pretty neat just in terms of having ChatGPT up and running in your console very quickly, and being able to customize the role. Using ChatGPT in the shell has been a really good experiences, cutting down on the distractions of using a browser and google search results a lot. But I think there is space for an even better and more feature-complete shell application for ChatGPT.
alannevill大约 2 年前
Opencommit - analyses git changes and writes a detailed commit message.
TimCTRL大约 2 年前
I use Poe [1] by Quora; It&#x27;s free on Web.<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;poe.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;poe.com</a>
jillesvangurp大约 2 年前
I use code GPT in VS Code and Intellij. And GPT for docs and slides in Google docs.
评论 #35947625 未加载
missingdays大约 2 年前
&gt; Which ones are actually worth using?<p>None
评论 #35946576 未加载
tikkun大约 2 年前
For me, in terms of ones I’ve used 10 times or more during the past week:<p>Chatgpt<p>An iPhone app to use gpt-4<p>An ai newsletter that sends me new tools (I’ve found lots of cool tools from it but none that I use regularly)<p>I think that’s it? Kinda surprising. There are so many gpt powered products I’ve tried but none I’ve stuck with.
评论 #35947920 未加载
gardenhedge大约 2 年前
3.5 does indeed suck.<p>4 is good but you still need to use it properly
balaji1大约 2 年前
And is GPT replacing google search for folks?
super256大约 2 年前
Copilot and kagi.com‘s quick answers.
ateeqhw大约 2 年前
botphobci.com to turn boring mono-style text into powerful, passionate human-like text.
hyperific大约 2 年前
News Minimalist. Major time savor.
dmitshur大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.you-tldr.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.you-tldr.com&#x2F;</a> is one I’ve been coming back to, though I don’t yet use these tools much. This particular one is handy for when I want to find out what a video with a click-baity title&#x2F;thumbnail is actually about, without having to start to watch it. It lets me satisfy that curiosity with a quick a paragraph summary instead.
mobius1大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been using a tool that I&#x27;ve been developing myself (with GPT assitance lol) to basically monitor issues in a list of Github repositories, make the requested changes, and open a pull request to close the issue. It can also monitor comments on a pull request, and classify them as &quot;question&quot; (respond with answer) or &quot;request&quot; (update PR with requested changes and respond with additional info).<p>It&#x27;s not perfect but it&#x27;s at a point now where it is allowing me to make significant progress on personal projects that I would not otherwise have time to do. I already sit in front of a computer at work all day. I want to minimize doing that outside of work, but I still have lots of code projects I want to do on the side.<p>Main repo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal</a><p>Examples:<p>- Drafting an action plan and coming up with open questions based on specific requirements (issue: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1</a>, PR created by bot: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;pull&#x2F;2&#x2F;files">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;pull&#x2F;2&#x2F;fil...</a>)<p>- See also asking the bot to write code based on a step in the generated action plan: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;issues&#x2F;3">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;issues&#x2F;3</a> and PR <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;pull&#x2F;4">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;download-simulator-2023&#x2F;pull&#x2F;4</a>. In this PR, pay attention to the comments I left; the bot takes feedback from the comments and will update the code accordingly, allowing you to iterate on a single PR before merging code<p>- Basic updates to existing HTML file (issue: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;issues&#x2F;4">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;issues&#x2F;4</a>, PR: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;pull&#x2F;5&#x2F;files">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;pull&#x2F;5&#x2F;files</a>)<p>- Writing an Arduino script from scratch based on specific requirements (issue: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;midi-looper&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;midi-looper&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1</a>, PR: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;midi-looper&#x2F;pull&#x2F;2&#x2F;files">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;midi-looper&#x2F;pull&#x2F;2&#x2F;files</a>)<p>Still lots of improvement to go but I&#x27;m having a lot of fun.<p>Exposition if you want:<p>My experience using GPT4 for programming has been pretty fun. First I was experimenting with prompts like &quot;Given &lt;this code&gt;, how do I accomplish &lt;this task&gt;?&quot; I have been discovering things about what types of tasks it&#x27;s particularly good at (generating action plans, breaking tasks down into subtasks, writing simple-ish code). The code is usually stuff I could figure out myself, but it&#x27;s still (sometimes) more efficient than me trying to write it, then do some google searching, update it, etc... The chat format also makes iterative improvement fairly easy, e.g. &quot;you forgot to use &lt;some variable&gt;&quot; or &quot;please add comments explaining what the code does&quot; or &quot;replace this text in the html with some generated content about a digital assistant tool&quot;<p>I&#x27;m a manager and team lead so I find myself writing a lot of tickets based on high-level product requirements for my team to work on. Because I am very familiar with the code base, I often provide a lot of technical detail, e.g. providing links to specific files, functions, and PRs relevant to the issue. I found that prompting GPT4 with a similar level of detail resulted in success. However, it was still really good at more general tasks.<p>An example of a task that GPT performs pretty well at: &quot;write an index.html landing page with a content section that is vertically and horizontally centered using flexbox. In the content section, generate a heading and paragraph talking about an AI-powered digital assistant for programmers. Add some basic styling to the page, with soft colors. The font of the heading and paragraph should be different. Serve index.html from a main.go file on port 8080. Also add an endpoint to the server at POST &#x2F;api&#x2F;number which returns a random integer between 14 and 37. In index.html, add a button that calls this endpoint and displays the number on the page&quot;<p>(GPT4 can handle this prompt easily with no errors in the code; GPT3 will struggle, so it needs to be broken down more)<p>I could do all of the stuff in that example myself. But so can AI. I prefer to write out what I want and get some code that&#x27;s usually 90%-100% perfect, make some slight modifications, maybe ask for some different color options, etc.. Point is, that&#x27;s probably 30 mins saved for the same end result (honestly, better, considering my design skills are nonexistent).<p>I work a lot with Github repos already, so it was straightforward to me to replace the ChatGPT interface with a &quot;Github interface&quot; which I&#x27;m already familiar with and like (open issue, reference issue from PR, merge PR, issue auto closed). I also like being able to iterate on a &quot;pending&quot; change in a PR by leaving comments before merge. Also, I can do it from my phone!<p>To see the specific prompts this tool is using as the foundation (at the moment), see<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;llm&#x2F;prompts&#x2F;code-change-request.tmpl">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;llm&#x2F;prompts&#x2F;cod...</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;llm&#x2F;prompts&#x2F;comment-diff-request.tmpl">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mobyvb&#x2F;pull-pal&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;llm&#x2F;prompts&#x2F;com...</a><p>If you have read this far, I hope it sounds interesting to you. The tool is GPL licensed, and I would love if other people tried it out so that I can get feedback on the best improvements to make&#x2F;bugs to fix.
josh7大约 2 年前
.
didgeoridoo大约 2 年前
ChatGPT. No point in adding an expensive middleman on top that’s usually just a few clever prompt tricks.<p>Side note: having gotten access to Copilot Chat, it’s disturbing how quickly the ChatGPT UI has become established in my mind as the standard. Copilot Chat, despite being integrated into VS Code, feels clunky and alien compared to ChatGPT in a separate window. Funny how fast new things become the standard by which others are measured.
评论 #35946853 未加载
theRealMe大约 2 年前
Yuck. I was interested in the intention of this thread, but it’s pretty obviously become “advertise your own tool.”
评论 #35948610 未加载
edpichler大约 2 年前
Please, the title is a bit misleading. GPT can be many things, including &quot;General Purpose Technology&quot;. The post is about the product ChatGPT.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;General-purpose_technology" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;General-purpose_technology</a>
评论 #35946499 未加载
评论 #35946600 未加载
评论 #35946522 未加载
评论 #35946586 未加载