TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ROS 2 Iron Irwini Release

55 点作者 kscottz将近 2 年前

7 条评论

amacneil将近 2 年前
Congrats to the Open Robotics team and everyone who contributed to this release!<p>Calling out a couple changes I&#x27;m excited about that we (Foxglove) helped contribute to:<p>- MCAP is now the default logging format in Rosbag2[0]. This is a much more performant and configurable format than the previous default (SQLite-based). SQLite is still a fully supported alternative.<p>- Message type definitions (schemas) can now be exchanged at runtime[1]. This means that tools such as rosbag2, or visualization tools such as Foxglove Studio[2] can now communicate with a ROS system over the network without needing a copy of the source code or complete ROS workspace.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;rosbag2&#x2F;pull&#x2F;1160">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;rosbag2&#x2F;pull&#x2F;1160</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1159">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;ros2&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1159</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;foxglove&#x2F;studio">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;foxglove&#x2F;studio</a>
cheeselip420将近 2 年前
Robotics is really really really really hard. So let&#x27;s turn the entire thing into a system of distributed microservices, using CORBA&#x2F;DDS for pubsub...<p>It&#x27;d be like if you designed a video game so that the physics engine (motion planning) happened in one process, while rendering (perception) happened in another process and the world state needed to be exchanged via pubsub. Why do we keep doing this to ourselves?
评论 #36048445 未加载
评论 #36047844 未加载
评论 #36048027 未加载
评论 #36048966 未加载
评论 #36047606 未加载
评论 #36050682 未加载
评论 #36049117 未加载
ragebol将近 2 年前
ROS (1&#x2F;2) is just damn handy. There&#x27;s a plethora of libraries available: navigation, localization, perception, motion planning, visualisation, record and replay events for debugging, high-level behavior definition with state machines and behavior trees, motion control, sensors, orchestration anything you need in a robotics system.<p>I&#x27;ve seen various half-assed versions or something akin to ROS (IPC to have process isolation and distributed, with some processes running on a RTOS) seen built over the years. All of which sucked in different ways. Especially a tool like RViz is always missing. And in many many robotics video I see (of a moderately complex robot), there&#x27;s ROS&#x27;s RViz on some screen.
评论 #36048628 未加载
评论 #36048785 未加载
captaindiego将近 2 年前
I like ROS, the library of things you can use to get prototypes running quick is nice, but wish they hadn&#x27;t rolled its own build system in addition CMake (Catkin) with the concept of packages, while not being a true package manager. Whenever your middleware dictates your build system things start to get pretty messy. My dream for ROS 2 (or maybe 3) is one where ROS does less instead of more - sometimes simpler is better.
RobotToaster将近 2 年前
How is package compatibility with the new version? When I looked at ROS before it seemed to have issues with certain packages only being available for older versions.
inamberclad将近 2 年前
ROS is a good research platform, but when it comes down to brass tacks, people stick with smaller, simpler systems. I&#x27;ve used NASA CoreFlight professionally and while it doesn&#x27;t have all the nice creature comforts, I&#x27;m much happier in a small, clean, C-only codebase that runs on Linux, VxWorks, and RTEMS, with two layers of abstraction at most.
EddieEngineers将近 2 年前
How can I get into robotics? I absolutely love the field from the outside but have zero idea how to get into it. Currently a software engineer &amp; studying mechanical engineering part time with a goal of going into robotics eventually, but it doesn’t seem to have a natural starting point for hobbyists.
评论 #36051982 未加载
评论 #36049767 未加载
评论 #36050777 未加载