TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Node.js built-ins on Deno Deploy

129 点作者 tjwds将近 2 年前

10 条评论

shrubble将近 2 年前
I do wonder about the long-term effects of Deno being Node-compatible; will it result in only Node programming being done since "Deno will handle it fine" and thus Deno specific stuff will not be developed?
评论 #36085394 未加载
评论 #36085064 未加载
评论 #36085342 未加载
评论 #36088733 未加载
评论 #36085343 未加载
评论 #36087102 未加载
评论 #36087097 未加载
评论 #36084923 未加载
lucasyvas将近 2 年前
There are many people that feel having Node support harms Deno&#x27;s goals, but I don&#x27;t agree.<p>To me, this is like complaining that you can mix JS into TypeScript projects. The only reason the latter is successful is because you can migrate from the former in a first-class way.<p>I don&#x27;t think Deno has the community support to make it on its own steam - that said, I think it&#x27;s a huge value add in terms of DX. I support them on this 100%.<p>Node is trying to add in some capabilities of Deno. We&#x27;ll see which one comes out ahead.
评论 #36087815 未加载
评论 #36085378 未加载
lolinder将近 2 年前
Deno is moving into a similar space as Kotlin started at by adding all this interop—they&#x27;re trying to be the &quot;better Node&quot;. Meanwhile Kotlin is frantically trying to differentiate itself because Java is closing the gap, but it&#x27;s hard for them to do because they&#x27;ve spent so long piggybacking on the Java ecosystem.<p>Deno is very vulnerable to the same fate. Yes, it&#x27;s easier to get adoption if you can plug into an ecosystem that is already popular, but then it&#x27;s not your ecosystem and the behemoth that actually owns the ecosystem will feel the threat and adapt.<p>If you don&#x27;t prioritize interop, your initial adoption will be much much slower, but if you make it out of the early stages you have an ecosystem of your own that has its own distinct advantages. The incumbent can&#x27;t just pull in a few good features and thereby take your mind share.
评论 #36085461 未加载
评论 #36087355 未加载
评论 #36087687 未加载
评论 #36087041 未加载
lucacasonato将近 2 年前
Hey folks - I worked on this. AMA
评论 #36084952 未加载
评论 #36084858 未加载
评论 #36085291 未加载
评论 #36088124 未加载
strangescript将近 2 年前
Slowly Deno is just becoming Node written in Rust with some added flexibility in certain areas. Not necessarily a bad thing but it feels like its three years too late to get major traction. Native TS is neat, but we also have TS compilers that are measured in milliseconds now.
评论 #36088976 未加载
sisve将近 2 年前
Am I the only one reading this right or am I the only one reading it wrong.<p>Deno is not supporting node.js built-ins. It&#x27;s deno deploy. Meaning that this will not work on other hosting platforms, right... or?
评论 #36090027 未加载
skybrian将近 2 年前
I recently got a simple edge function working on Netlify for a tiny hobbyist project, with some minor confusion but it was fine. I&#x27;m wondering how Deno Deploy compares?
评论 #36087900 未加载
robust-cactus将近 2 年前
At this point, given the state of module loading on node and other ecosystem problems, my reasons for switching to deno (or bun) are dwindling.
评论 #36085389 未加载
mrwnmonm将近 2 年前
Could you please explain what Deno is like I am five? (three actually)
评论 #36088279 未加载
评论 #36087132 未加载
endisneigh将近 2 年前
ironically, the more node js goes into Deno, the less likely I am to switch. imho they should stay the course and not include too much node stuff.
评论 #36084976 未加载
评论 #36085406 未加载