TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Quantum computing could be five years away

19 点作者 mbpp超过 13 年前

8 条评论

swordswinger12超过 13 年前
That has to be one of the most tortured opening metaphors I've ever seen in a tech news story. Could they really not come up with an analogy more elegant than, "This building over here is pretty big, but this building is REALLY BIG!!!!"?
评论 #3610427 未加载
IgorPartola超过 13 年前
Couldn't resist: <a href="http://xkcd.com/678/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/678/</a>
zitterbewegung超过 13 年前
This is a vast oversimplification of quantum computing. Also, I think its pretty optimistic on the timeline of quantum computing. If you want to read more detailed content see Scott Aaronson's blog <a href="http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/</a>
评论 #3610206 未加载
评论 #3609988 未加载
cathrithbo超过 13 年前
&#62;some problems in mathematics will remain beyond the limits of quantum computing<p>I don't think it's surprising that quantum computers, by themselves, will not be able to solve mathematical problems. Problem solving is not a feature of hardware per se, it is done by humans. Perhaps one day by AIs, too, if we can discover how to program them.<p>Two tantalising potential benefits of Quantum Computers:<p>(1) the ability to model all kinds of matter efficiently at the molecular level which will spur the development of nanotech<p>(2) people will ask 'Where are these humongous computations being performed?' and then embrace the 'many worlds interpretation' of quantum mechanics, which will in turn create further scientific and philosophical progress
评论 #3609982 未加载
heydenberk超过 13 年前
Articles with titles that could've been true (but weren't) for the last decade are much like articles with titles consisting of questions to which the answer is no.
pwpwp超过 13 年前
Reminds me of:<p>"In a 5 year period we get one superb programming language. Only we can't control when the 5 year period will be."<p><a href="http://www.cs.yale.edu/quotes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.yale.edu/quotes.html</a>
WalterSear超过 13 年前
Don't be ridiculous. Everyone knows that it's 'ten' years away, along with AGI and cold fusion.
评论 #3610200 未加载
评论 #3609959 未加载
Craiggybear超过 13 年前
"Quantum computing could be five years away"<p>They said this fifteen years ago on a radio broadcast. I was sitting there. I heard it.<p>Now, for the last time, <i>where</i> is my <i>jetpack</i>?