TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Classic components could be replaced by rubber in next-gen loudspeakers

129 点作者 crousto将近 2 年前

11 条评论

_Microft将近 2 年前
These speakers seem to work like this:<p>There is a rubber layer, coated with conducting material to serve as electrodes. The signal is applied in form of a high voltage which makes the electrodes attract each other and contract the rubber in between perpendicular to the surface (i.e. the rubber layer gets thinner). Since the rubber material is relatively incompressible though (volume of the material doesn&#x27;t change), the surface area of the membrane has to increase in return. To generate sound from that, the membrane is stretched over a cavity that is under higher than ambient pressure which helps expand the &#x27;balloon&#x27; when its surface area increases. This displaces surrounding air which means the contraption is emitting soundwaves.<p>(I could only find a thumbnail of the first page of a paper from that professor and extracted this from it)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aes.org&#x2F;e-lib&#x2F;browse.cfm?elib=21108" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aes.org&#x2F;e-lib&#x2F;browse.cfm?elib=21108</a>
评论 #36181277 未加载
评论 #36181644 未加载
sublinear将近 2 年前
&gt; Current loudspeakers use a magnet coupled with the movement of a copper coil to vibrate a membrane. In the future these heavy, bulky, and expensive components could be replaced by a dielectric elastomer membrane.<p>They mention efficiency, but not power. I don&#x27;t like how this is framed as the general future of all speakers when it&#x27;s really just the future of midrange drivers.
评论 #36181832 未加载
Puts将近 2 年前
Wouldn&#x27;t rubber dry out over time? If you pay for a good set of speakers you probably want them to last for decades.
评论 #36182959 未加载
评论 #36181381 未加载
评论 #36180918 未加载
runeks将近 2 年前
I find it a bit strange that this article doesn’t mention electrostatic speakers, as the two appear similar.<p>It would also be worth mentioning if this new tech suffers from the same limitation as electrostatics, namely that the membrane’s range of motion is so small that you need several square meters of membrane to reproduce low frequencies at high volume.
dsr_将近 2 年前
This appears to be describing an electrostatic speaker. They&#x27;re on the market, and have been for decades, using mylar or a similar material.
评论 #36180561 未加载
评论 #36179653 未加载
评论 #36179374 未加载
评论 #36179517 未加载
tapper将近 2 年前
My screen readers reads that site in a verry strange way. It says that there is soft hyfens in a lot of the words so it reads the words like repro­duce as&quot;repro duce&quot;
评论 #36181550 未加载
gtvwill将近 2 年前
Ehhhh interesting, might go well for tweeters. Can&#x27;t see it being great for bass. Can&#x27;t be arranged in a paraflex horn config.
Kapura将近 2 年前
The article mentions the fragility, but seems extremely optimistic on the ability to solve this, but I&#x27;m not sure way. It just says &quot;once this is overcome&quot; but the things it seems to be talking about are major barriers to a commercial product.
ksec将近 2 年前
It was just the other day I was thinking how big, comparatively speaking the speaker components are in MacBook and iPhone. And if we could somehow make it even smaller without any compromise on quality and longevity.
buildbot将近 2 年前
This seems only mildly different than already existing electrostatic drivers??? In terms of getting rid of heavy magnets at least.
评论 #36179427 未加载
sandreas将近 2 年前
If you want an affordable, good sounding speaker that you can build yourself, you might wanna take a look at Tech Ingredients:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CKIye4RZ-5k">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CKIye4RZ-5k</a>