TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Is GPS Free?

90 点作者 tooltower将近 2 年前

12 条评论

jrockway将近 2 年前
From reading the thread, I have a question that maybe HN knows the answer to. I feel like I haven&#x27;t had to do a cold start on new GPS chips in a really long time. Even in terrible sky conditions, I&#x27;ve never had to wait 12 minutes to download the almanac. Do chips just ship from the factory with this data, or is it not needed anymore. (I know about AGPS, but that&#x27;s not involved. This happens on receivers with no possible way of communicating to the outside world other than the serial port I&#x27;m reading navigation messages from.)<p>Even if I do a reset + cold start in u-center or similar, I still don&#x27;t have to wait 12 minutes. I wonder why.
评论 #36180581 未加载
评论 #36180580 未加载
评论 #36180523 未加载
评论 #36180936 未加载
评论 #36180480 未加载
评论 #36180482 未加载
avalys将近 2 年前
Thought one: wow, the fact that this was asked on a subreddit called &quot;Ask Historians&quot; really makes me feel old.<p>Thought two: I&#x27;ve never considered how bizarre it is that GPS is an enormously expensive satellite constellation launched and maintained by the United States military that we make available for free to the entire world. As a US citizen I take it for granted - but it must be strange for someone to grow up in (for instance) Lebanon and use a GPS device.
评论 #36181327 未加载
评论 #36180966 未加载
moffkalast将近 2 年前
Fundamentally because supporting one receiver costs the same as supporting an infinite amount of them, the rest is politics.
评论 #36180505 未加载
评论 #36180397 未加载
Animats将近 2 年前
Because it&#x27;s one-way and predates the era of DRM. To charge for it (which the EU&#x27;s Galileo system originally planned to do), you need a crypto system, secure modules in receivers, a key distribution and billing system, and customer service. That could end up costing more than providing the service.
评论 #36181495 未加载
评论 #36180236 未加载
评论 #36180201 未加载
caminante将近 2 年前
I&#x27;d trust the wiki entry [0] over Reddit comments.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_Positioning_System" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_Positioning_System</a>
bentobean将近 2 年前
It isn’t free. You paid for it. We all paid for it.
评论 #36182503 未加载
评论 #36182508 未加载
lr1970将近 2 年前
GPS is owned by US government and operated by US military [0]. And US military does not charge retail :-)<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_Positioning_System" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Global_Positioning_System</a>
mensetmanusman将近 2 年前
History: America puts it up to help target ICBMs, etc. US taxpayers&#x2F;military give it away for free as a gesture of good will which also has political benefits.
评论 #36180734 未加载
评论 #36180507 未加载
评论 #36180790 未加载
vlovich123将近 2 年前
Wasn’t SA killed because the algorithms defeating it became widely known and thus there wasn’t really any point to it?
评论 #36180436 未加载
aynyc将近 2 年前
I tho it’s paid for by American general tax. Is it not?
评论 #36182280 未加载
Simulacra将近 2 年前
I&#x27;m surprised no one has mentioned that the a reason it&#x27;s free is that people will use it. If people had to pay for it then they might not leave it on, or use it as much, and as a result a lot of the mobile apps that harvest location data would be affected.
评论 #36180368 未加载
djaouen将近 2 年前
I dunno. Why is fire free?
评论 #36180178 未加载