TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

ROFL: An open-source license that promotes fun in coding

23 点作者 tslmy将近 2 年前

14 条评论

indigane将近 2 年前
I know most of these sort of licenses are just for fun, but on a serious note, if you don&#x27;t care about licenses, and you don&#x27;t care what people do with your code, I would recommend you use The Unlicense, instead of one that sounds funny.<p>The Unlicense is almost like MIT License but without any burden on those using your code.<p>On the other hand it offers you the same (perhaps handwavy) protections from liability as MIT License does.<p>If you&#x27;re familiar with Creative Commons, it is similar to a CC0 license, but for code.<p>Basically it&#x27;s a legitimate way of saying &quot;I don&#x27;t care about licenses, stop bothering me, do whatever&quot;.<p>If you use GitHub, then Unlicense is one of the choices you can select when setting up a repository.
评论 #36194537 未加载
jraph将近 2 年前
&gt; Embrace a lighthearted attitude while working with the software<p>It seems I wouldn&#x27;t respect this license if I ever had to contribute a fix in emergency (while stressed).<p>I guess writing with license was fun. Now, please don&#x27;t use it seriously ;-)<p>I think a lot of things make this license non-free, an example is: &quot;be available when someone asks for help. To ensure that can happen, set up a channel where people can reach you.&quot;. For a license to be open source, I should be allowed to just dump my contribution and run away, never to be seen again. I believe this would be Debian&#x27;s Dissident Test [1].<p>(To the author: as a consequence, I think you should not mention &quot;open source&quot;. It&#x27;s likely wrong, misleading and it&#x27;d be best to reserve this to OSI-approved licenses anyway - or make it clear it&#x27;s a caricature, parody or a satire)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.debian.org&#x2F;DissidentTest" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.debian.org&#x2F;DissidentTest</a>
评论 #36208953 未加载
pabs3将近 2 年前
Hmm, I&#x27;m not sure this meets the Open Source Definition:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.org&#x2F;osd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensource.org&#x2F;osd</a><p>It discriminates against people who are odious bores :)
评论 #36194157 未加载
评论 #36193941 未加载
Tade0将近 2 年前
Reminds me of the now infamous:<p>&quot;The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.&quot;<p>And the hilarious, but necessary exemption:<p>&quot;I give permission for IBM, its customers, partners, and minions, to use JSLint for evil.&quot;<p>Personally I would love to see something named e.g. &quot;corporate drone license&quot;, which would allow people in small, dead-end projects in large organizations to use it freely, but at the same time prevent said organizations from using it at scale to charge subscription fees for someone else&#x27;s IP.<p>AGPL comes to mind as the closest thing I can think of, but I suppose the concept itself might be impossible to translate to legalese.<p>All I want is to give back some agency to people whose life circumstances require them to hold on to their current position.
评论 #36194611 未加载
wheybags将近 2 年前
&gt; No vulgarity (dirty jokes, swearing words, etc.).<p>Antithesis of &quot;promoting fun&quot;
croes将近 2 年前
Sounds good, doesn&#x27;t work.<p>&gt;Be inclusive with the community around this software. Foster an inclusive and welcoming environment for all individuals, free from discrimination, harassment, or exclusionary behavior.<p>(a) No vulgarity<p>(b) Mind the cultural differences<p>(c) No aggressive behavior.<p>(b) determines what is counted as (a), some is partly valid for (c)
评论 #36193864 未加载
评论 #36194005 未加载
nsajko将近 2 年前
A Code of Conduct posing as a licence?
评论 #36193796 未加载
Hamuko将近 2 年前
&gt;<i>The Rejoice of Fun</i><p>&gt;<i>No vulgarity (dirty jokes, swearing words, etc.)</i><p>This license does not sound that fun.
sirodoht将近 2 年前
Love the intention of this! I&#x27;m part of this community [1] which also has similar intentions of programming as fun, rather than as goal accomplishment or as a tool.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chaitinschool.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chaitinschool.org&#x2F;</a>
seodisparate将近 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;choosealicense.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;choosealicense.com&#x2F;</a> is a good resource that lists a bunch of licenses explained.
评论 #36194485 未加载
评论 #36194659 未加载
rapnie将近 2 年前
This aligns with CUPID Joyful Coding [0] by Dan North.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cupid.dev" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cupid.dev</a>
评论 #36193799 未加载
sneak将近 2 年前
This is not an open source license. The restrictions make it nonfree.
mordae将近 2 年前
It promotes use of non-free graphics editing software. Pass.
jayp1418将近 2 年前
Better to use Just4Fun Licence