TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sequoia is splitting into three VC firms

156 点作者 LastNevadan将近 2 年前

7 条评论

ksec将近 2 年前
Ok, the most important question, which one of the three invested in Sam Bankman-Fried?
评论 #36215781 未加载
评论 #36217201 未加载
sequoia将近 2 年前
Off topic but I really wish headlines like this would refer to the firm as "Sequoia Capital." Reading this headline is a bit jarring for me.
评论 #36216955 未加载
评论 #36218769 未加载
评论 #36216899 未加载
评论 #36216951 未加载
moneywoes将近 2 年前
Which fund will have the best performance the next 20 years?<p>My guess south east Asia
评论 #36213756 未加载
评论 #36214705 未加载
评论 #36217273 未加载
slugiscool99将近 2 年前
Think this will make it easier for them to invest in strategically important technologies (like AI) in adversarial countries (China) without getting pushback like they have been
评论 #36217950 未加载
SkyMarshal将近 2 年前
TLDR: Main reason for the split is conflicts between portfolio companies in different regions (eg Stripe in the US, vs Airwallex in China, vs unnamed in India all going global and competing with each other), and increasing complexity of centralized back-office regulatory compliance operations across these different regions.
评论 #36214994 未加载
评论 #36214171 未加载
OrvalWintermute将近 2 年前
Sequoia Shanghai<p>Sequoia Beijing<p>Sequoia Hong Kong<p>;)
评论 #36214964 未加载
say_it_as_it_is将近 2 年前
The partners aren&#x27;t team players after all, eh?
评论 #36212457 未加载