It’s funny as I remember as a kid people would argue against the sports illustrated swimsuit edition because it let people imagine the women without closed and that’s just wrong.<p>And I wondered if places that require women to wear coverings had the same logic (ie,”if people see too much ankle they can imagine a bare leg”).<p>My school once got penalized in a cheerleading competition because the uniforms only went over the knees instead of the other teams where it went to their ankles. What was the point as both wore bloomers underneath.<p>However, I think it’s the idea of stopping people from thinking lascivious thoughts. I think it’s a losing battle as people have great imagination.<p>I would have a problem if these deepnude sites had X-ray vision or something, but just predicting what someone looks like nude is hard to stop. Can you even make it illegal to imagine someone nude? I think we’ll find out soon in the next 20 years as people start adding “nude mode” to Apple Vision and Teams where all the attractive people appear nude.