TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Opt Out Project

161 点作者 WallyFunk将近 2 年前

12 条评论

Backing5890将近 2 年前
I like the premise of the site but the "The Opt Out Way to Use Email" even mentioning using LastPass despite their multiple breaches makes me question this site.
评论 #36269501 未加载
评论 #36266854 未加载
nologic01将近 2 年前
We need a name for the place people go when they &quot;opt out&quot;. A positive and defined &quot;somewhere&quot; instead of a negation and a landscape with a random collection of hacks.<p>Getting the diverse, opinionated and variedly incentivised open source communities to agree on thinking as a unified &quot;something&quot; is like herding cats. But its high time that the desirability and existence of an &quot;opt out&quot; is recognized formally and that won&#x27;t happen without large scale coherence.<p>Maybe even the notion &quot;open source&quot; is not longer helpful towards that end. Big tech has inflirtated and one way or another &quot;sponsors&quot; pretty much every major open source initiative.<p>The starting point is data sovereignty and privacy, but more fundamentally, what we need is agency in the use of information technologies.
评论 #36270070 未加载
评论 #36269785 未加载
评论 #36269152 未加载
评论 #36270092 未加载
godzillafarts将近 2 年前
I like the general idea and also try to conceal my identity as much as reasonably possible when out in the world. However, not having a smartphone just isn’t an option for a lot of parents. I’ve long wanted to ditch my iPhone and get a dumb flip phone, but my infant son’s daycare uses three (!) smartphone apps for critical services. Think checking in&#x2F;out, door access, critical communications, payments. There are no alternatives; you can’t do anything of these things outside of their respective app.
评论 #36269603 未加载
predictabl3将近 2 年前
I want &quot;noiwillnot.com&quot; and have it be a very simple site, with a list of offenders, and a I pledge&#x2F;declaration:<p>&quot;No, I will host or join OSS communities on closed proprietary platforms. Never again. No, I will not join your Discord. No, I will not participate in your subreddit. No, I will not follow your project updates on Twitter.&quot;<p>Matrix, Discourse, and Mastodon exist are are used very successfully by a number of high profile projects. They don&#x27;t force me to use proprietary, inaccessible, insecure, Electron-ridden clients. They don&#x27;t force me into draconian privacy policies. They don&#x27;t force me to prop up VC-funded money pits that <i>will eventually come back around to extract anything they can</i>. They don&#x27;t treat the closed edges of their platforms as moats by which they can, ooh yeah, build a user base and then eventually hinder the experience in order to extract their deserved profits.<p>These things matter but people are so short-sighted and forgetful that they just jump from proprietary platform (cough, password managers are another great example), and then inevitably have to jump ship again in N years. Maybe I&#x27;m the odd one, but I&#x27;d much rather invest a bit more upfront, and deal with UX growing pains, than keeping throwing my knowledge, time, overall investment into a pit that ends up burned by capitalism.
评论 #36265944 未加载
评论 #36266109 未加载
评论 #36265900 未加载
评论 #36270068 未加载
评论 #36267834 未加载
paulryanrogers将近 2 年前
StartPage may not be so anonymous now that it&#x27;s owned by an ad company. Still, nice to see folks thinking about ways to be more private.
amelius将近 2 年前
We need to stimulate or else force companies to make honest products and services again.<p>Like a true divide between those who make hardware&#x2F;software, and those that run it.<p>Like in the old days of the internet, where companies such as DEC made the equipment and universities and government agencies ran software on them.<p>Another approach is to ban all user tracking. We have to ask ourselves, do we really need those highly targeted ads? And do we really need this invisible force that nudges people to consume more in this age of climate worries? It&#x27;s the same force that sucks people down these spirals of hurtful online content.
o1y32将近 2 年前
At the end of each article<p>&quot;Follow me on Twitter or Mastodon, or get my newsletter.&quot;<p>No, I&#x27;m not kidding, it&#x27;s there. That is exactly why we come to this website to &quot;opt out&quot; of things, right?
评论 #36269685 未加载
nestock将近 2 年前
Opt out by opting in to my newsletter
Aldipower将近 2 年前
Opt in to opt out. Very funny. I do not need a newsletter to say to no.
danieldk将近 2 年前
People will never opt out from big tech at a large scale. Sure, if I was a hermit or didn&#x27;t live in The Netherlands I could opt out of WhatsApp. But all group communications happen in WhatsApp, eg. school stuff and play dates for our daughter, sport practice&#x2F;match coordination, etc. To opt out of WhatsApp basically means opting out of a social life.<p>Once products are so deeply woven into society that it is not possible to lead a normal life without them, they basically become common infrastructure&#x2F;utilities. The solution is to regulate privacy requirements (like eg. the GDPR does) and pricing (where applicable).
评论 #36270164 未加载
pmoriarty将近 2 年前
The right thing should be the easiest thing to do.<p>Yet we live in a world designed in such a way that the easiest thing is to do is giving away your data, throwing away your privacy, and giving a tiny minority of people enormous power over us.
dcreater将近 2 年前
I support the goal but the info in this site is horribly superficial or misinformed or straight up wrong.<p>Duckduckgo? Thats already more of the same. They made a deal with Microsoft for God&#x27;s sake.