TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Accidental HFT Firm (2018)

127 点作者 Twixes将近 2 年前

15 条评论

SkipperCat将近 2 年前
One thing I love about the HFT world is the race to be fast. You cant get better by scaling out, you have to make your trading server as fast as possible. This leads to some whacky but clever hacks. I&#x27;ve always felt like I was working on a F1 race team when working in HFT.<p>I never came across isolating CPUs, TCP offload, FPGAs, layer 1 switching until I joined a HFT shop. Its like a whole different way of looking at computing system architecture.
评论 #36270628 未加载
评论 #36270191 未加载
评论 #36270006 未加载
评论 #36271577 未加载
评论 #36270622 未加载
评论 #36270470 未加载
评论 #36273147 未加载
评论 #36271975 未加载
评论 #36274952 未加载
smabie将近 2 年前
This is the best post I&#x27;ve found that actually describes what it&#x27;s like to run a HFT firm &#x2F; desk. Probably best article ever written about HFT.<p>For me HFT is the most interesting job one can have and it requires you to be good at a variety of things to make money: low level tech, quant modeling, risk management, business sense so you can cut good deals, etc.<p>Unfortunate the industry is unfairly maligned by people who really don&#x27;t know what they&#x27;re talking about (like Michael Lewis in Flash Boys). It&#x27;s cheaper to trade now (especially for retail) than it ever has been in history and the positive effect this has had on the capital markets and the economy in general cannot be understated.
quickthrower2将近 2 年前
Had a skim. The &quot;An asset manager’s conclusion&quot; section is very interesting. If you are the HFT, you may not be selling to idiots. Something I always wondered about Market Making HFT, what happens when the market moves suddenly because of fresh info, all those orders you have to fulfill that are smart.
评论 #36270038 未加载
评论 #36269701 未加载
kajaktum将近 2 年前
I got sucked into a finance rabbit hole and I have been reading about some &quot;tricks&quot; in market making and I don&#x27;t see why these are problematic? Even if it is a problem, how would you even prove it? Is it wrong to place an ask order at much lower price, then backing off if it doesn&#x27;t work out? Should I just put my limit order and let it stay there?<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Spoofing_(financhttps:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2010_flash_crashe)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Spoofing_(financhttps:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wik...</a><p>2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Layering_(finance)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Layering_(finance)</a><p>3. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2010_flash_crash" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2010_flash_crash</a>
评论 #36271135 未加载
评论 #36271065 未加载
reisse将近 2 年前
Gosh, seeing someone actually posting in the public about their experience using Orc gives me very strange feeling.<p>Some context here. Software design-wise, Orc was stuck in 00s. Not scalable, hard to support, hard to add new features, etc. And the corporate structure did not allow for innovations.<p>Somewhere in the end of 00s group of engineers left Orc (the company) to rebuild the trading platform from the ground up, and formed a new company, called Tbricks. Tbricks was such a success that Orc (again, the company) spend a lot of cash to acquire it, put key people from Tbricks to the leading positions and sunset legacy (classic, as we called them) Orc products.<p>After the merger, the company was renamed to Itiviti. I came there ~a year after the merger and worked for five years as an SWE in the Tbricks team. The goal of the merger was to migrate all Orc customers to Tbricks in a year or two. Five years later I left the company, and there still were a few of major customers not migrated yet. Orc was supported by one or two persons full-time, and a few of greybeards who moved on to the new projects, but still had the knowledge. And I think it is still bringing few millions USD a year in license costs.
pjanoman将近 2 年前
While I&#x27;m generally pro-HFT and market making, I&#x27;m seeing some comments that are equating market making and high frequency trading. They&#x27;re not the same thing. As an HFT firm, you can have two kinds of strategies: Liquidity providing and liquidity taking. This article calls these two strategies market making and &quot;being an aggressor&quot; in the &quot;Strategy Zero&quot; and &quot;Survival!&quot; sections. The HFT describes their aggressor strategy as follows:<p>&quot;Mr. F., one of the original hires, coded what we called Strategy Zero. It was simple: have no position, wait for an option edge of a reasonable size, at least a tick. Then, hit it. Wait. Dump it out and take a tick profit.&quot;<p>In this case, the strategy involves 1) seeing that you can buy a security at $10, 2) knowing that the security is actually worth $10.01 and will move to this price in a few seconds, 3) lifting someone&#x27;s $10 offer, 4) waiting the few seconds for the market to move, and 5) hitting someone&#x27;s $10.01 bid for a $.01&#x2F;share profit.<p>This liquidity taking strategy is not similar to a liquidity providing strategy. Liquidity providing is leaving orders on the order book for anyone to take and gaining money from one person who buys your shares for $10 and from another who sells shares to you at $10.01. This involves more risk to your business.<p>I think that if you want to debate the merits of whether working at an HFT firm is an actually useful service, you have to look at how often the HFT firm provides liquidity versus takes liquidity. Providing liquidity more obviously tightens spreads and improves prices, as you can&#x27;t be a successful liquidity provider unless you provide the best prices first. Liquidity taking, however, involves lifting orders from exchanges that you know are incorrectly priced, which seems to me like a more obvious &quot;bad&quot; (or at least less good than liquidity providing).
评论 #36273464 未加载
__d将近 2 年前
I&#x27;m still hoping that Matt is one day able to complete this book.
评论 #36270090 未加载
评论 #36275504 未加载
renewiltord将近 2 年前
Author is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;threads?id=mhurd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;threads?id=mhurd</a><p>I&#x27;d pay $100 for the book
momofarm将近 2 年前
So these HFT guys doing is daytrade with options? That&#x27;s quite risky.....if you are not with the trend you may blow up account quickly
lordnacho将近 2 年前
Great blog, I learned a lot from it over the years. The confluence of market making and options is especially interesting.<p>I also used Orc back in the day to trade options, and it&#x27;s complicated. The thing about options is you have a whole bunch of instruments that are closely related, priced off the same underlying. So there&#x27;s a smoothness constraint in there that you need to think about (have a google for &quot;non-arbitrage vol surface&quot;).<p>Quickie options tutorial: when you trade an option, you have curvature risk. Meaning that when the price moves, the hedge is not some fixed number of contracts. This can be good or bad for you, depending on whether it&#x27;s concave or convex. On top of that, normally if your gamma is positive (ie you make money either way it goes) you are paying for it by the option losing value (theta is negative). There&#x27;s a bunch of these greeks, which are just the sensitivities of the option price to various inputs like price, implied volatility, interest rates, etc. Different parts of the surface have different greeks.<p>So it&#x27;s a bit of a balancing act. A sophisticated MM might decide to hold all their greeks within some range. This would mean slightly skewing your prices in some area of the surface in order to entice someone into trading with you, plus keeping an eye on the underlying.<p>As for market making, it would be nice if prices just stayed the same. People would come and buy things from you for 101 and they would come and sell things to you at 99. You&#x27;d just be transporting one order to the other one in time, the perfect middle-man business. The customers win because they don&#x27;t have to meet each other, and you win because you have 2 more in the account.<p>Sadly that isn&#x27;t what happens. Sometimes a guy comes by who wants to buy at 101, and then 102, and then 103. The market has moved, and you being such a nice guy have sold at those prices and are now short when the thing is more expensive. This not cool, but the real problem is that you were standing there the whole time offering product while not knowing what it was worth. What&#x27;s worse is that you&#x27;re more likely to get deals when this is the case. This is the adverse selection issue: you have a bunch of competitors when things are plain sailing but then when things move you &quot;win&quot; the deals.<p>So, what to do? One thing you can do is just not trade with that guy with the massive orders. Find a bunch of punters who aren&#x27;t dealing massive orders, and deal in opposite ways to each other. Often what actually happens is some guy who is good at marketing builds a business doing this, and since he doesn&#x27;t know how to also do the market making, he cuts a deal with a market maker. This is what you might have read about. You split the earnings between the marketing business and the risk business.<p>All of the above is of course helped by being really fast. If you see a bunch of sellers, you pull your bids quickly so they don&#x27;t sell to you. If you see that you need to move your prices, you do it fast so that you&#x27;re first on the new price.<p>There&#x27;s even more to this game in the form of arbitraging other people&#x27;s orders, but we&#x27;ll leave that for now.
ironSkillet将近 2 年前
This blog is fascinating. Thanks for sharing.
marsupialtail_2将近 2 年前
Perhaps I charged too little when I contracted away my 10x random forest inference solution...
metadat将近 2 年前
Discussed at the time:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16222530" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16222530</a> (5 years ago, 32 comments)
euroderf将近 2 年前
I have yet to be convinced that HFT is anything other than a big scam for skimming fractions of percentage points off of everything it can get its mitts on.
thr_low_latency将近 2 年前
A bit of background around the company: They received the largest fine (until that point in history) for trying to use this to front run the market from their dark pool.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-securities-regulation-itg-idUSKCN0QH1Q020150812" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reuters.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;us-securities-regulation-itg...</a>
评论 #36270316 未加载