TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Buying an entire Egghead Software store (2005)

72 点作者 kaladin-jasnah将近 2 年前

7 条评论

PreInternet01将近 2 年前
Yes, did that a few times as well: not for an OS (but an antivirus product, so close-ish...) and not with Egghead but mostly with CompUSA and Fry&#x27;s (both now also long gone, I think?). This was at a time when it was theoretically already possible to try&#x2F;buy software over the Internet, but the resulting clogging of our connection lead to too many complaints, so a road trip it was!<p>Other than the bugs&#x2F;extreme performance regressions they turned up in our product, the most interesting takeaways from these exercises were that: 1. most consumer software is really, really bad; 2. good package design is really, really hard.<p>It may be hard to imagine now, but unboxing software used to be quite exciting. How many manuals? How good? Early software releases had pretty good documentation: I still fondly remember the first editions of Microsoft&#x27;s developer tools as well as their Office suite, which came with a full set of printed decent-quality manuals. That practice went out of the window for good shortly after, though, and online documentation has IMHO never reached the same quality. But that may just be the nostalgia speaking...
评论 #36280249 未加载
评论 #36282968 未加载
评论 #36282635 未加载
评论 #36281066 未加载
评论 #36283414 未加载
stuuuuuuuuu将近 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20060212093806&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blogs.msdn.com&#x2F;oldnewthing&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2005&#x2F;08&#x2F;24&#x2F;455557.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20060212093806&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blogs.msdn...</a><p>It&#x27;s unfortunate that the MSDN blog shufflings over the years resulted in losing all the comments on the original post...
Jiro将近 2 年前
They told the employees that if they got the programs to work with Windows, they could keep them.<p>Of course, that makes them income, so the employees would have to pay income tax on them. I wonder how many of the employees scrambling to get programs that they didn&#x27;t already think were worth buying on their own, figured this out?<p>Also, the employees got to keep the programs after Windows shipped. Which meant that they were probably reported for income tax purposes at their full price (because Microsoft bought them at full price), but by the time the employees got to keep them, the programs were probably discounted in actual stores.
评论 #36283057 未加载
high_priest将近 2 年前
In the &quot;Decompiling Lego Island&quot; video [1], the author mentions there was a fix specific for this game in Windows 2000 leaked source code. It probably came from compatibility testing initiatives like one in the article.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MToTEqoVv3I" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MToTEqoVv3I</a>
jmclnx将近 2 年前
Yes, the good-old-days :)<p>I really miss those days, personal systems were much easier to maintain and hack. With that said, at this point I had been using Coherent for at least 5 years.
rvba将近 2 年前
And now in Microsoft the designers and porject managers brag that they dont even use Windows at all.<p>If they had a real CEO it would be a good cause for instant termination.
评论 #36282543 未加载
EAtmULFO将近 2 年前
Sounds like software piracy if they were sharing copies.