TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OpenDNS warns about Google DNS

34 点作者 cr4zy大约 13 年前

11 条评论

jemfinch大约 13 年前
"We don’t persist logs for our users without accounts and configured networks, I’m not sure Google makes the same statement."<p>What FUD. Was this statement from the FAQ[0] not explicit enough? "With Google Public DNS, we collect IP address (only temporarily) and ISP and location information (in permanent logs) for the purpose of making our service faster, better and more secure. Specifically, we use this data to conduct debugging and to analyze abuse phenomena. After 24 hours, we erase any IP information."<p>Or what about this more detailed explanation[1] on the linked privacy page? [Originally posted, but removed on account of formatting issues]<p>If you don't know the answer to a question about a competitor's service, the appropriate, ethical thing to say is, "I don't know." When you say, "We do &#60;good thing X&#62;, I don't know if they do," you are by your omission sowing the seeds of fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the audience, for your economic reasons.<p>[0] <a href="http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/speed/public-dns/faq.html#privacy" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/speed/public-dns/faq.html#...</a><p>[1] <a href="http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/speed/public-dns/privacy.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/intl/en-EN/speed/public-dns/privacy.h...</a>
评论 #3637135 未加载
评论 #3636941 未加载
waffle_ss大约 13 年前
I switched from OpenDNS to Google for DNS because I was tired of seeing ad pages when I mistyped a domain name in my browser. At least Google isn't hijacking NXDOMAIN results to make money. You can check your own DNS provider for this behavior as well as others with Berkeley's Netalyzr[1] Web service.<p>[1]: <a href="http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/</a>
评论 #3636984 未加载
jonknee大约 13 年前
What a poor article. Full of "I don't know", "maybe" and just plain FUD. The fact is between Google and OpenDNS, only one makes money at it. Google provides DNS because it makes the internet more reliable, which helps their business. OpenDNS provides DNS so they can sell you stuff (or ads).<p><a href="http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq.html</a><p><a href="http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy.html</a><p>That's more information than anyone should need for Google DNS.
udp大约 13 年前
Please use the original title where possible - even if "OpenDNS warns about Google DNS" is going to get you more upvotes than "A Closer Look at Google Public DNS".
sixcorners大约 13 年前
Is there a way to use OpenDNS from any location and permanently opt out of their NXDOMAIN hijacking? I know you can configure it from their website but you can only control your own domains so it doesn't work when you access a wifi hub. You also have to run that daemon all the time which seems like a slightly bigger privacy concern.<p>&#62; We don’t persist logs for our users without accounts and configured networks, I’m not sure Google makes the same statement.<p>Does that mean that both my DNS requests AND my HTTP requests to whatever webserver is intercepting my requests to test.invalid (<a href="http://guide.a.id.opendns.com/?url=test.invalid" rel="nofollow">http://guide.a.id.opendns.com/?url=test.invalid</a>) are not being logged? Does that mean my requests on wifi hubs that are configured with OpenDNS are being logged?<p>What does it mean to discourage automated DNS lookups? What else do I use it for? dig?<p>Couldn't one argue that it is a good idea to keep the number of companies that have access to your information low? From that perspective wouldn't it be prudent to use Google for everything?
评论 #3637261 未加载
评论 #3636779 未加载
mike-cardwell大约 13 年前
It's so easy to install a local copy of Unbound on your desktop, even on a Windows box. I'm surprised when I see hackers using Google or OpenDNS rather than using their own DNS resolver. Unbound supports DNSSEC too.
评论 #3637172 未加载
评论 #3637076 未加载
secure大约 13 年前
I think both the headline is wrong (I don’t see where they explicitly warn people, can someone point it out?) and the interview contains no actual facts. The only statements are "probably" and "I’m not sure"…
评论 #3636788 未加载
twiceaday大约 13 年前
A company warns about its competitor without any substantial claims.
gpmcadam大约 13 年前
Was there a reason for linking in at page 2?<p>First page, for those that didn't realise: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseackerman/2012/02/25/a-closer-look-at-google-public-dns/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseackerman/2012/02/25/a-close...</a>
ksec大约 13 年前
In the end it is about trust. Sometimes i just wish ISP would provide better DNS services.
评论 #3637984 未加载
pasbesoin大约 13 年前
This is really a nothing article: It (rightly) warns, very generally, about (over) consolidation of services, but beyond that says nothing specific.
评论 #3636955 未加载