TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What character was removed from the alphabet? (2020)

261 点作者 paulkrush将近 2 年前

29 条评论

Symbiote将近 2 年前
I thought this would be about Old→Middle→Modern English, in which case the lost letters are Ƿ, ð, þ and æ.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Middle_English#Alphabet" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Middle_English#Alphabet</a>
评论 #36372112 未加载
评论 #36372743 未加载
评论 #36377654 未加载
评论 #36374870 未加载
评论 #36370897 未加载
评论 #36372656 未加载
paulkrush将近 2 年前
&quot;It would have been confusing to say “X, Y, Z, and.” So, the students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were essentially saying, “X, Y, Z, and by itself and.” The term per se was used to denote letters that also doubled as words, such as the letter I (for “me”) and A. By saying “per se,” you clarified that you meant the symbol and not the word.<p>Over time, “and per se and” was slurred together into the word we use today: ampersand.&quot;
评论 #36370403 未加载
评论 #36370346 未加载
评论 #36370760 未加载
评论 #36370319 未加载
评论 #36372801 未加载
评论 #36370353 未加载
mcdonje将近 2 年前
&quot;&amp;&quot; wasn&#x27;t ever in the alphabet in the same capacity as the letters that represent sounds. It was there as a keyword signifying the end of the list. Then its name was expanded to clarify that it was not a normal letter but a keyword. Then that expanded name was misinterpreted by people who never needed the list termination signifier to begin with.<p>Lesson? KISS. They should&#x27;ve implemented it with brackets.
评论 #36372441 未加载
评论 #36371597 未加载
评论 #36370939 未加载
评论 #36371640 未加载
jmclnx将近 2 年前
When I was very young, I remember AE being used in various printed materials (school books).<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;%C3%86" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;%C3%86</a><p>But by the time I was in High School it seemed to have disappeared.
评论 #36370561 未加载
评论 #36370509 未加载
评论 #36370413 未加载
评论 #36370371 未加载
评论 #36370527 未加载
beardyw将近 2 年前
Ah, mondegreen<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mondegreen" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mondegreen</a><p>I remember the Maxell tape ads (ibid) &quot;Me ears are alight&quot;.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;XEe0qqPAC6E" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;XEe0qqPAC6E</a>
评论 #36371488 未加载
评论 #36372111 未加载
chrischen将近 2 年前
In the classic alphabet song &amp; comes between Y and Z. It’s been hiding there all this time.
blacksmith_tb将近 2 年前
I naively thought to be &quot;part of the alphabet&quot; our ancestors would have needed to, you know, use &quot;&amp;&quot; in words - the article weakly hints at this for &quot;&amp;c&quot; as being equivalent to &quot;etc&quot; (saving keystrokes even before they had keyboards, I guess). But given that they didn&#x27;t, say, write &quot;sand&quot; as &quot;s&amp;&quot; I will politely refuse to accept it as a letter.
评论 #36378866 未加载
weinzierl将近 2 年前
I always thought <i>amper</i> was another word for merchant because in my native German the &amp; symbol is called <i>&quot;Kaufmanns-Und&quot;</i>, literally &quot;<i>merchants-and&quot;</i>.
hirundo将近 2 年前
This was good planning, if it was still part of the alphabet we couldn&#x27;t use it for an URL query parameter delimiter.
评论 #36370502 未加载
WarOnPrivacy将近 2 年前
In the early 1970&#x27;s, I saw the &amp; appear in some of our older alphabet books. The absolutist child in me tried to work out if that bit of archaic data was authoritative or not.<p>Those books were likely printed in the 1950s.
评论 #36373226 未加载
arek_nawo将近 2 年前
Never would I have thought that &quot;&amp;&quot; was ever part of an alphabet. It&#x27;s more of a symbol, like &quot;.&quot; or &quot;;&quot;. HN is sometimes a source of curious things.
评论 #36370706 未加载
justin_oaks将近 2 年前
I was hoping this article would be about the letter C and be from the future.<p>The letter C is useless. It either makes the sound that S does or the sound K does. Instead of C we should just use an S or a K for every place a C is.<p>Some may argue that without C we wouldn&#x27;t have CH. And then I say, &quot;Why do we need two characters to represent a single sound? It should have it&#x27;s own letter.&quot;<p>Alas, English spelling is all kinds of messed up. And I&#x27;ll have to resign myself to that fact.
评论 #36371399 未加载
评论 #36370716 未加载
评论 #36370862 未加载
评论 #36379476 未加载
franciscop将近 2 年前
I keep saying that, by chance, it&#x27;s a pity that the English alphabet has exactly 23 letters and doesn&#x27;t have a single one more. Had it one more letter, say &quot;ñ&quot; or &quot;ç&quot; or some other, that&#x27;d make it perfect for base64: 24*2 + 10 = 64. Instead now we have 62 &quot;base&quot; alphanumeric alphabet, and two symbols that are disagreed upon since they have to be chosen depending on the context.
评论 #36370665 未加载
评论 #36372902 未加载
NelsonMinar将近 2 年前
The alternate question is &quot;why are these 26 characters the American English alphabet?&quot; It&#x27;s fairly arbitrary, a collection of historical accidents and changes in orthography.<p>And it&#x27;s incomplete. You can&#x27;t really write American English with just the usual 26 letters. Ñ and the ʻokina are proper letters and necessary for writing a bunch of American words correctly. The various kahakō are helpful too but they are treated as diacritics and not full fledged separate letters.
评论 #36370876 未加载
评论 #36370894 未加载
4cao将近 2 年前
I was expecting this would be about the letter Ⱶ or one of the other Claudian letters of the Latin alphabet: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Claudian_letters" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Claudian_letters</a>
markwalllberg将近 2 年前
In the early 1800s, school children reciting their ABCs concluded the alphabet with the &amp;.<p>It would have been confusing to say “X, Y, Z, and.” So, the students said, “and per se and.” Per se means “by itself,” so the students were essentially saying, “X, Y, Z, and by itself and.”<p>So it was just some shorthand tossed in there
paulkrush将近 2 年前
I think of Hacker News as a source of interesting things that I as a nerd, did not know &amp; this fits.
JoeAltmaier将近 2 年前
OP says &#x27;per se&#x27; means &#x27;by itself&#x27;. But in this case (the alphabet song) it makes more sense for &#x27;per se&#x27; to have it&#x27;s other meaning: &#x27;as such&#x27;. That is, the letter means the same as &#x27;and&#x27;.
kazinator将近 2 年前
Q: What character was removed from the alphabet?<p>A:<p><pre><code> 1&gt; (diff (range #\a #\z) &quot;the alphabet&quot;) (#\c #\d #\f #\g #\i #\j #\k #\m #\n #\o #\q #\r #\s #\u #\v #\w #\x #\y #\z) </code></pre> Plus all all non-alphabetic characters other than space.
anotherhue将近 2 年前
Ever wondered about those old &#x27;U&#x27;s that look like V?<p>Now you know why &#x27;W&#x27; is so named.
narcraft将近 2 年前
Tom Bombadil
jwilk将近 2 年前
Related from 2022: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32249465">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32249465</a> (&quot;The History of ‘Ampersand’ (2020)&quot;, 178 comments)
DonHopkins将近 2 年前
The Story of Ampersand, in The Phantom Tollbooth universe.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sharegpt.com&#x2F;c&#x2F;J1U3T7m" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sharegpt.com&#x2F;c&#x2F;J1U3T7m</a>
contingencies将近 2 年前
Imagine a roguelike using all of these obscure characters where key plot elements are the elucidation of their true histories.
kzrdude将近 2 年前
Part of the english alphabet, but in which region, all english speaking places? I&#x27;m curious where it comes from.
评论 #36370408 未加载
rvba将近 2 年前
Why is M before N in the alphabet. It should be N first, then M!
zoklet-enjoyer将近 2 年前
&amp;totse
rovr138将近 2 年前
ch, ll
评论 #36370774 未加载
re-thc将近 2 年前
Google