TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Compromise Creates Values

43 点作者 bkitano19将近 2 年前

12 条评论

magic_hamster将近 2 年前
There is something to be said about being obliviously spoiled, privileged or entitled, and also trying <i>not</i> being this way when you come into money.<p>When I joined my second job in tech, it was a massive bump in almost every way, and immediately I noticed the people around me were drastically different than the colleagues I had in the previous place, a frivolous tiny start up. The new people had almost no appreciation for money; they moved about like nothing could really go wrong; and while they weren&#x27;t mean, they were somewhat spoiled and detached from reality.<p>I remember thinking to myself that no matter how much I make, I don&#x27;t want to be like them in terms of character.<p>I know people who were born into wealthy families and hearing their silly complaints about how some miniature detail is not 100% in their otherwise perfect and seemingly challenge-free lives was almost physically painful.<p>However, it made me realize something too. Being happy and having substance does not directly correlate to how much money you have. Evidently, a lot of very rich people aren&#x27;t particularly happy, and in this article, the author also found no meaning anywhere until they lost their job.<p>It&#x27;s the ability to appreciate whatever you have, your assets, your health, and strive to be a better person, have some goals to aspire to. When I catch myself getting upset about something completely meaningless, I try to remember this.
评论 #36394664 未加载
评论 #36398923 未加载
评论 #36389783 未加载
tikkun将近 2 年前
Related:<p>Company&#x2F;personal values that don&#x27;t involve a trade-off are not values<p>Strategies that don&#x27;t involve a trade-off are not strategies<p>A good test is to ask yourself - if this statement was inverted, would it still be plausible?<p>For example, &quot;hire the best&quot; doesn&#x27;t make much sense as a value, because it doesn&#x27;t describe a trade off and the opposite doesn&#x27;t make sense as a value. Move fast and break things is a reasonable value. Just as move slow and aim for perfection is a reasonable value.<p>And &quot;build great products by spending more time on R&amp;D than everyone else&quot; is closer to a reasonable strategy, because it can be semi-inverted (&quot;build great products by spending minimal time on R&amp;D but launching as many as possible to see what works&quot;) and because it involves a trade-off.
评论 #36396965 未加载
mindvirus将近 2 年前
I don&#x27;t think compromise itself is a reaffirmation of our values. Compromise often erodes values. Disagreement prioritizes values.<p>I think generally we have the same values. Honesty, transparency, integrity, expediency, travel, etc. However what we don&#x27;t share is priority of them. To the author&#x27;s point, do you value having pets more than you value freedom to travel? Reasonable people could disagree. And there is compromise to be had, but if you&#x27;re not careful you can get the worst of both worlds by trying to split the difference.
评论 #36391867 未加载
评论 #36391532 未加载
评论 #36394714 未加载
NKosmatos将近 2 年前
Is is customary to comment on a submission without upvoting it? That&#x27;s how I feel about this one...<p>No disrespect and no offence meant, but I&#x27;ll never understand all these privileged people who have a lot of money, and subsequently free time, and still feel this way about their lives.<p>How come it&#x27;s always poor, lower&#x2F;mid class people who don&#x27;t have enough money that always complain about not being able to do things (hobbies, interests, desires...) and always the rich, upper class people who complain that they don&#x27;t have an interest in anything since they can have everything :-&#x2F;
评论 #36391273 未加载
评论 #36391244 未加载
评论 #36391920 未加载
评论 #36391755 未加载
scotty79将近 2 年前
It&#x27;s funny how much weight people put on money. And how they think abundance of money means solving all of their problems and removes all challenge from life. You are decaying organic matter soon to be corpse trying to interact with similar doomed entities who constantly mess up their lives just like you do yours. And you think money solves anything but the most rudimentary crap? Your parents are still gonna die, somebody will still get cancer.<p>Even if you have all the money you wish you still have the same crap jelly in the box on top of your neck that will make you suffer and same ugly mug in front of it that will make people run away. You barely solved anything.<p>Not to mention you might want at some point to co-live with some other unfortunate soul and finding a lasting match is a challenge that rarely ever anyone succeeds at and money there can be as much of an obstacle as it is an asset.
smallerfish将近 2 年前
I have 6 dogs and also have to leave the country every 3 months to keep my tourist visa current. Having a really good (and, fortunately, affordable) dog boarder is the answer to this.<p>Not sure that really changes his point; only that sometimes there is a C when you are looking at choices A &amp; B.
carapace将近 2 年前
There&#x27;s a simple algorithm, based on this idea, for eliciting your hierarchy of values. IIRC it goes something like this:<p>- - - -<p>Imagine a mundane task of medium importance, e.g. brushing your teeth or doing the dishes.<p>Now imagine something comes up that interrupts that task, and it&#x27;s important enough to make you stop doing the previous task and attend to the new thing.<p>Repeat previous step.<p>- - - -<p>I&#x27;m skipping over all the details, of course, but the point is that if you do it right you wind up with a ranked or graded list of values, motives for action.
评论 #36393577 未加载
apienx将近 2 年前
I think most normative ethicists would take issue with this proposition.<p>Our values dictate our choices. Compromises (and limited-choice situations) test our values.<p>From a deontological perspective, compromise destroys values.<p>From a consequentialist perspective, compromise doesn&#x27;t have any effect on the values as the consequence is the higher value.<p>From a virtue ethics&#x27; perspective, values are character traits virtually decoupled from habits and other choices.
评论 #36391563 未加载
debacle将近 2 年前
Most people, even smart people, live a life devoid of self reflection.<p>You don&#x27;t have values if you don&#x27;t live intentionally, and the majority of people make decisions on a very short timescale, and without truly considering opportunity costs.<p>Even among those that live within an adopted moral framwork (e.g. religion, stoicism, etc), I haven&#x27;t found people to be particularly well thought out.
StopTheWorld将近 2 年前
Congratulations, another member of the professional-managerial class has rediscovered existentialism.
评论 #36391606 未加载
aiunboxed将近 2 年前
I guess what you mentioned is the story of most of the people who have tech money :)
svilen_dobrev将近 2 年前
software is made of decisions.<p>or... scratch that. software is just reflection of life...<p><i>Life</i> is made of decisions.<p>Anything else is not life, but mere existing.