TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Arduino Joins Zephyr Project

43 点作者 manchoz将近 2 年前

5 条评论

lionkor将近 2 年前
I've had the pleasure of using Zephyr OS on an embedded bluetooth project with a few others. We were using NRF52x chips, with a dev board, and Zephyr was one of the least painful parts of the whole thing. Can absolutely recommend Zephyr in general.
评论 #36435041 未加载
genmud将近 2 年前
Zephyr is such a great project, I really have enjoyed working with it and the Nordic (NRF5x) is awesome. I think over the next 3-5 years it is really going to get more and more adoption compared to alternatives like freertos or vxworks.
bfrog将近 2 年前
It makes sense if you consider the devices being made now are faster and more complex than ever.<p>Multi core SoCs with different archs and memory protection schemes all sharing a bus. This complexity can be wrangled with device tree and Zephyr readily and has good company with other large silicon vendors being contributors.<p>I for one am looking forward to seeing more contributions and companies joining.
评论 #36434124 未加载
gmiller123456将近 2 年前
Can anyone explain what this means for Arduino users? The article seems to be a lot of marketing speak, and for people familiar with Zephyr already.
评论 #36461093 未加载
idank将近 2 年前
is Zephyr a good option in a project that aims to expose a UART device through BLE using an nrf52x chip? At a glance it seems pretty low level, capable and possibly overkill. If not, what&#x27;s more suitable?<p>Hopefully that makes sense, I&#x27;m new to all of this.
评论 #36439304 未加载
评论 #36438427 未加载