TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cory Doctorow, science fiction as a weapon against the metaverse:We are not free

12 点作者 Idiot_in_Vain将近 2 年前

3 条评论

smoldesu将近 2 年前
&gt; his budding metaverse — tramples relentlessly over a new kind of human right that is not talked about enough.<p>Which human right is that, again? Your attention span? Your willingness to sign abusive contracts?<p>I wish Cory Doctorow would meaningfully refute these problems instead of fetishizing them for science fiction purposes. He&#x27;s worse than Stallman in that respect - he acknowledges that we have these complex society-level issues, and instead of devising a solution he steelmans an insane opinion and waits to be proven wrong. Again, I don&#x27;t even disagree with a lot of his thesis statements - the Metaverse is probably a net negative for humanity, and copyright law shouldn&#x27;t be the be-all end-all of information. I just disagree with the hyperbole he uses to frame these discussions, because it makes all of us look like fools by extension.<p>If fixing society was as easy as reading more Doctorow, everyone would do it. Scratching our <i>Black Mirror</i> itch doesn&#x27;t usually come with a solution proposal, though.<p>&gt; The longer your name is, the more untraceable you become.<p>For some reason I don&#x27;t believe you, Mr. Doctorow.
评论 #36459717 未加载
mark_l_watson将近 2 年前
That was a fun rant to read!
anonymouskimmer将近 2 年前
At the start of the article Doctorow&#x27;s poor grammar choice of using too many improper nouns made it a difficult read.<p>&gt; trying to reimpose <i>that</i> which is being fought against<p>&gt; When they only take into account <i>those</i> they consider as <i>such</i><p>I got the intent of these sentences on some rereads, but these were poor noun choices from a communication perspective.<p>&gt; In other words, restaurants automatically adapt their menus to the customer’s taste<p>&gt; You can only get out of such a society if you start walking away from the centers of power — and from everything that ties you to the system.<p>A working solution is to train people to say &quot;No&quot;. If you tell the algorithm that you aren&#x27;t interested in its selections at this time the AI will, necessarily, broaden its propositions. And teaching people to say &quot;No&quot; is a very good thing to do, as too many of us are taught to default to just accepting what those in power offer.<p>&gt; I can’t believe that it only takes one click today for the whole world to find out what you’ve set in motion.<p>This is because you (Doctorow) have done the hard work of becoming famous enough that people pay attention to you and spread your ideas around. One click doesn&#x27;t cut it for anyone just starting out.<p>&gt; The changes will only be real if we act analogically. In other words, the digital world must be a world of encounters, but we must stay on the street. It’s the analog that produces change<p>Saying &quot;No&quot; or &quot;Yes&quot; is a binary, not an analog. Try pretending that the offerings of Big Data AIs aren&#x27;t Hobson&#x27;s choice, and you might be surprised at what actual choice there is. Unlike Hobson, AIs want you to say &quot;Yes&quot; to one of their offers, and will offer you as much as they can to get that &quot;Yes&quot;.<p>&gt; “the only way to win an ideological battle is to extinguish the imagination, and that’s what neoliberalism is trying to do through technology.”<p>I&#x27;m pretty sure that many ideologues are trying to convert people to their ideologies by <i>sparking</i> the imagination, not by extinguishing it.<p>&gt; My 15-year-old daughter knows that the system can’t offer her anything<p>Because she has come to this conclusion on her own, or because you have in-Doctorow-inated her to believe this?