TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Rocky Linux claims to have found 'path forward' from CentOS source purge

14 点作者 mmrezaie将近 2 年前

4 条评论

reacharavindh将近 2 年前
Honestly, I’m tired of this. We were going to use Rockylinux as a base for the new version of our research cluster at a University used by researchers from all over the world. We are a tightly funded shop with money allocated as parts of research grants. We were running off of CentOS because a few tools that researchers use were built “for” RHEL by the commercial vendors. Since Redhat now considers users of CentOS “freeloaders” and “leeches”, we have to move on to a better distribution that doesn’t have greedy commercial interests and works with the open source community in the spirit of open source including redistribution freedom. To be fair, even though we were using CentOS at no cost, we have reported a fair share of bugs to RH that I hope to believe benefited the overall community.<p>We have settled on making the effort to move to Debian for the compute nodes.<p>One thing we could not break out of is FreeIPA :-( We are not brave enough to run FreeIPA on Debian or find a completely new alternative in Debian that wouldn’t break us while we are already changing so much. So, we are going to pay for RHEL for one server to run IDM.<p>I will tell the researchers that come to us needing RHEL compatibility to pay for RH license out of their research grants, or spend the time and work with me to make their stuff work on Debian(I can already see what choice they will make).<p>I hope the fine folks and management gurus at IBM&#x2F;RH rejoice with their short term profit at the cost of long term loss of faith and ruin.
评论 #36518214 未加载
评论 #36518388 未加载
评论 #36519383 未加载
评论 #36518676 未加载
评论 #36518170 未加载
评论 #36517917 未加载
socrates137将近 2 年前
&gt; Setting aside the large numbers of angry people who don&#x27;t really understand how open source licenses work, our impression is that the core issue here is that there are an awful lot of people who feel that simply because this is Linux, they have some kind of right to get it for free. Unfortunately, they don&#x27;t. That is not what the &quot;free&quot; in Free Software means, and it never was.<p>Something about this irks me. I realize there are some differences between FOSS, FLOSS, and open source. And I realize sometimes there’s some ambiguity there. But I’m still not sure I agree.
pipo234将近 2 年前
Would it be possible to:<p>1. create a free dev account<p>2. get the sources<p>3. merge changes into rocky repo<p>4. have the account terminated by the Hat<p>5. goto 1?<p>Subversive, but mostly in compliance with GPL <i>and</i> Red Hat EULA... Ish. Kinda.<p>But I probably made an error here. Who can point it out?
评论 #36517899 未加载
评论 #36519835 未加载
评论 #36518735 未加载
nuker将近 2 年前
Related: GPLv2, Red Hat, and You<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36517045">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36517045</a>