TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We Analyzed 1,626 Banned Books Here's What We Found

16 点作者 joering2将近 2 年前

7 条评论

nonethewiser将近 2 年前
I find it highly subjective how they differentiate between banned and excluded books. They are all books deemed inappropriate for children. The “book ban” terminology suggests books should not be banned. But clearly there exist some books that dont belong in a children’s library.
评论 #36528536 未加载
评论 #36528496 未加载
评论 #36530577 未加载
评论 #36528499 未加载
评论 #36528707 未加载
electromech将近 2 年前
The meaning of "banned" can be misleading. When I looked into previous "banned books" data sets I found that some of the books were moved up an age level (e.g., from elementary school to high school) which is not what people think of when they hear the word "ban." Others were books that sounded religious in nature (e.g., I recall a book from the Christian publisher, "Zondervan") which is understandable for U.S. public schools.
评论 #36528919 未加载
sacnoradhq将近 2 年前
Banning any book about Rosa Parks comes across as a passive-aggressive declaration of racist white nationalist ideology.
pluto_modadic将近 2 年前
okay, chart shows: &quot;activism &amp; social themes&quot; 44%, LGBTQ 24%, ... family 16%, etc, with the removal reason only being &quot;mature&quot; in 1.6% of the cases... and leads to the reasoning suggested being: &quot;1) Virtue signal by people in positions of institutional power to voting-age parents interested in school choice, parental rights, and wedge social issues to the detriment of non-voting age students 2) Reject and exclude topics that challenge a perceived status quo from the public discourse (e.g. non-heteronormativity, non-cis identity, non-traditional gender roles, and non-Judeo-Christian books are targeted)&quot;<p>this feels like &quot;I don&#x27;t understand evolution, and I can&#x27;t let my kids understand it&quot; from Futurama, but it&#x27;s about civil rights or the existence of ⓣⓗⓔ ⓖⓐⓨ~
electromech将近 2 年前
Where does the &quot;1,626&quot; number come from?<p>In their data set they have 2,551 books in four categories:<p>Banned in Libraries and Classrooms, Banned in Libraries, Banned In Classrooms, Banned Pending Investigation,<p>If I filter out the &quot;Banned Pending Legislation&quot; entries, I get 1,164 books.
评论 #36528776 未加载
starik36将近 2 年前
They are not &quot;banned&quot; if I can have Amazon deliver them to my door step.
评论 #36528416 未加载
jeisc将近 2 年前
wake up we are one finger away from living in a post apocalyptic world so anyone and even children need to know as much as possible about the world thus keeping books from anyone is an injustice and even harmful in a adverse living conditions like in the walking dead for example...