TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Is Elon Musk Destroying Twitter?

26 点作者 roschdal将近 2 年前

19 条评论

crop_rotation将近 2 年前
I think the simple explanation seems to be that he vastly overpaid for it, tried his best to get out of buying, and now that he has sunk all this money into it, he is trying all quickfire ways of making money via Twitter (most of which seem ridiculously bad but I doubt there are many good options for making good money via Twitter).
评论 #36555910 未加载
评论 #36560633 未加载
brucethemoose2将近 2 年前
Elon isn&#x27;t <i>trying</i> to destroy Twitter. It looks like he is making impulsive, uninformed decisions... Kinda like a Twitter user shooting off Tweets.<p>Therefore it&#x27;s hard to say how fast the ship is sinking, if at all. He could make a brillant change tomorrow, then do something horrific 80 seconds later, and who knows what the net effect would be.
bemusedthrow75将近 2 年前
Yes. The only real question is whether he&#x27;s trying to or it&#x27;s just happening anyway.<p>When your competitor is Mark Zuckerberg and he can moot an alternative with the sole USP being &quot;sanely run&quot;, and this sounds like a positive development, you know value is being destroyed.<p>But this was predictable way back, including for instance the Thai cave rescue, where his suggestion being shot down led him to make unwarranted, vile personal attacks.<p>Elon Musk comes across as a malignant narcissist. Twitter is his narcissistic supply. It is going as well as anyone remotely informed would have predicted.<p>He could have got out of this for a couple of billion dollars, a telling off, and a small hit to his credibility with backers. But no. He has had his thin skin exposed, and everything avoidable that has happened since is the inevitable consequence of him lashing out while decompensating.
评论 #36556097 未加载
yawpitch将近 2 年前
Interesting philosophical question: if a man buys a burning dumpster and then, giggling madly, proceeds to throw in several sticks of dynamite caked, for truly inexplicable reasons, in his own feces, can he really be said to have destroyed it, or has he merely, if perhaps prematurely, put it out of the world’s collective misery?
faefox将近 2 年前
The site is totally unusable right now unless you&#x27;re a paid subscriber, in which case it&#x27;s only very slightly less unusable - so by definition I&#x27;d say yeah, Twitter as we knew it has been destroyed. Whether Elon intends to backpedal in the next 12-24 hours as seems to be his MO remains to be seen.
评论 #36555964 未加载
EA-3167将近 2 年前
Makes you glad he&#x27;s just a figurehead at SpaceX, doesn&#x27;t it?
评论 #36565600 未加载
hindsightbias将近 2 年前
SpaceX and Tesla had adults in the room. How much they steered Elon vs he steered them can be debated.<p>Twitter has no adults in the room. He can’t help but destroy it.
Zigurd将近 2 年前
Start with the fact that he didn&#x27;t want to buy it. He probably thought he could acquire it, make some changes, and flip it for less than a settlement would have cost. That didn&#x27;t work out. If you&#x27;re wondering if there&#x27;s a plan, the plan didn&#x27;t work, and now there is no plan. It&#x27;s the special military operation of LBOs.
dogetech将近 2 年前
What I&#x27;M more afraid is that we will be under ZUCK control totally. He is going to create a massive inter application growth for his new application. I&#x27;m really worried about twitter as well
garbagecoder将近 2 年前
He&#x27;s definitely destroying Twitter as we knew it. Whether something new will come from it remains to be seen. I wouldn&#x27;t hold my breath, but I&#x27;m not going to claim to be psychic.
rvz将近 2 年前
Nope.<p>We&#x27;re just watching the over-reaction here once again screaming at another Twitter speed bump magnified by the techies.<p>Just like the other speed bumps before, this will be yet another nothing.
评论 #36555751 未加载
minimaxir将近 2 年前
yes
frendiversity将近 2 年前
No, he&#x27;s transforming it into a different service while getting value from the existing userbase. It&#x27;s a way to make a popular tech company without relying on sheer luck that it gets a critical mass of users.
centmot将近 2 年前
Just experimentation. He bought the company at the top of the market and has a large debt bill, likely that is all there is to the frequent changes.<p>It&#x27;s obvious that existing users will find this unsettling.
评论 #36556315 未加载
ftxbro将近 2 年前
No, first he made it more free and now he is preventing abusive scraping by bots. He is making it better.
AHOHA将近 2 年前
For good!
wrycoder将近 2 年前
No
NX9mqsSv8将近 2 年前
It&#x27;s the revolving butthurt filters on every site with simulated user discourse (including HN). There is no such thing as a &quot;dangerous idea&quot; or &quot;malinformation.&quot; But, what remains after all the thoughtcrime is censored out is just plain propaganda.
loopsody将近 2 年前
Nope. The (people aka) users, who are ... most educated, most intelligent and, ... most followed, are destroying twitter.<p>In somewhat more comprehensible terms: ... the golden calves are destroying twitter, not the guy who bought the thing from the guy who had no fucking idea what he was doing until someone told him ... (aka ... the dog).
评论 #36555331 未加载