TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

On Dark Triads in Silicon Valley

31 点作者 wasi0013将近 2 年前

4 条评论

jchonphoenix将近 2 年前
Funny. I think I trip the filter on generally distrusting people, but not because I assume they're lying. I mostly distrust people because most people love to talk and give advice on things they aren't knowledgeable enough to be trusted on. They don't necessarily mean harm. Ray Dalio's take on this is that most individuals that give advice have low believability weighting.
sacnoradhq将近 2 年前
Yep. I always see more psychopath-tendencies&#x2F;assholes associated with MAANG megacorps. Just one example: At Habitat for Humanities build, most of the Meta people left an hour early, didn&#x27;t help cleanup, and didn&#x27;t communicate with the site manager. Former boss drove a white Mercedes SUV: (You already know what that means because there&#x27;s a correlation of purchase to driving behavior beyond stereotypes.)<p>The biggest signal of narcissism: Inability to take feedback constructively. Unless they&#x27;ve been somewhat socialized for professional behavior, narcissists tend to react explosively and aggressively at anything other than praise.<p>A secondary signal of narcissism: Always having to be &quot;right&quot;, usually by gaslighting the other person or slippery lawyering.
评论 #36580236 未加载
评论 #36594425 未加载
badrabbit将近 2 年前
The work culture and environemnt is an important factor here. In my recent experiences for example, an environemnt where people are constantly pitted against each other and appearing weak&#x2F;not-smart can have dire consequences (e.g.: seen colleagues fret over visa issues) results in an environment where there are a lot of people with a smile on their face while holding a sharp knife behind them, waiting to stab whomever they can in the back. Loyalties and betrayals, doing things for the sake of appearances,etc...<p>I have also seen environemnts where all that matters getting prominent people in prominent cliques to like you. When I had more manual work, meeting your metrics exactly, not less or more, showing up on time and being friendly&#x2F;chatty mattered the most.<p>Everyone has their personalities and I will leave it to the psychoanalysts to asess people but since the subject is specific to work environments, my opinion is that sociopathy, egocentrism and machavellianism are esentially traits you are forced to develop to make ends meet or move up the corporate ladder. These horrible perosnalities are a problem only if you have a healthy top-down environemnt and culture to begin with.<p>For example: work environments where people like to argue about politics every single time have egomaniacs influencing cliques. But this is tolerated by management and rewards these people.<p>Humility being rewarded,a &quot;no stupid questions&quot; culture, firmly and strongly enforcing separation between personal and professional lives and being fair to everyone (really gets under my skin when people gossip&#x2F;slander, managers use back channels to dig info about candidates and bullying people) is what I consider a good work environment.<p>It is good for workers and it is good for productivity and the bottom-line. But people are short sighted and care about ego stroking and sociopaths become managers all the time and the problem with these people to me is that they care about things other than money and people. At work, everyone is there to make money, help the company maximize profits and do so ina sustainable way (treat coworkers and subordinates right).
评论 #36577810 未加载
rogerkeays将近 2 年前
The &quot;what to do&quot; and &quot;tests&quot; sections of this article is spot on! As for the sociopath&#x2F;psychopath distinction, I think both terms refer to people with a Cluster B personality disorder. Since this is such a mouthful, I just call them <i>predators</i>, or if I don&#x27;t want to scare people: <i>vogons</i>.