Sex workers worry that Threads could kill their business

So then continue to use Twitter? Not every new social media tool needs to be a fit for every industry. Additionally, sex work occupies a grey zone in which it&#x27;s not always appropriate for the platform to... err, platform sexual content.<p>If people wish to contact sex workers then they&#x27;ll use Twitter because it&#x27;s the place to go for sex workers. Presumably this was already an issue when Instagram (Meta) stopped permitting sexual content. Why would they expect Meta&#x27;s new app be any different?

The legitimate ones should probably be more mad about FOSTA-SESTA, and the fact that it killed places such as Craigslist.<p>The ones that spam feeds can go away, as far as I&#x27;m concerned. But trust me, it isn&#x27;t like Instagram isn&#x27;t filled with thristraps anyway.

I think modern porn (which is very different from traditional) flew under the radar for too long. It’s sort of a recreational drug and should be regulated so users could still use it freely, but it wouldn’t tease them at every corner.<p>I’m a user myself, but when I see it or its sales on a “generic” platform that’s just annoying and doesn’t belong there. What sex workers seem to want is being presented in-your-face at all crowded places. And when allowed they do it aggressively due to bloody competition and strong personal interest.

Did Fast Company hire the headline writer from Vice?<p>(Reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Ia7fUQXskvA">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Ia7fUQXskvA</a>)

My immediate thought was that Twitter would be for the right (in almost all manners) and porn&#x2F;escorts.

Launch a microblogging platform for anything but the worst universal taboos. The end.

Stop with the newspeak.

[deleted]