TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The WHO is about to declare aspartame can cause cancer

12 点作者 activiation将近 2 年前

10 条评论

version_five将近 2 年前
This is a dupe and it's only technically true, it's being added to some low impact "possible carcinogen" category that already contains vast swaths of food and human activities. It has no material impact on any health guidance, it's just a clickbait headline.
评论 #36648205 未加载
jsnell将近 2 年前
Recent discussions:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36519942">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36519942</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36522471">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36522471</a><p>And to a lesser extent:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36562739">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36562739</a>
pzone将近 2 年前
This puts aspartame in the same category as aloe vera. It is classified as less risky than drinking hot beverages or eating red meat.
gcanyon将近 2 年前
Healthcare Triage did a review of the research years ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Mf82FfX-wuU">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Mf82FfX-wuU</a> tl;dw: artificial sweeteners get a bad rap, multiple studies have found no harm, studies that did find harm were on rats (which often doesn&#x27;t translate to humans), and the harms associated with excess sugar consumption are numerous, well-founded, and damning.
Someone1234将近 2 年前
Previous threads with tons of comments:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36519942">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36519942</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36522471">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=36522471</a>
TheLoafOfBread将近 2 年前
Eventually we will get into meaningless situation like in California with Proposition 65 - Basically everything will be labeled that it can cause you cancer and people will start ignoring it.
评论 #36653483 未加载
Simulacra将近 2 年前
I wonder how long the diet soda manufactures have been working on this, and preparing for it. I would not be surprised if they already have some thing ready to go to replace it with.
评论 #36644381 未加载
评论 #36644374 未加载
teeray将近 2 年前
If aspartame makes someone’s weight loss program tolerable enough to lose 50+ pounds, then its risks are probably worth it to reduce other risks borne by being obese.
Eumenes将近 2 年前
Good, the less profits soda companies have, the better. Its bad for you regardless of the sweetener. 35-40 grams of sugar per 12 oz can. Insanity.
navjack27将近 2 年前
Good!<p>I&#x27;m for banning artificial sweeteners. Something always told me that you can&#x27;t get away with having a thing that tastes like sugar but doesn&#x27;t exactly act like it to the body without some wrong thing happening. Either the taste reaction to the body has to do something strange (tastes like sweet so let&#x27;s react the same way we would to sugar but oops this isn&#x27;t sugar so now we&#x27;re all out of whack) or yeah, something like this where it&#x27;s carcinogenic.<p>Now mind you I&#x27;m not some wacko who is also against MSG and &quot;chemicals&quot;. I also understand that some of the population needs alternatives to sugar. But some of these need full unbiased rigorous testing in humans. What do these things do to our bodies and how do our bodies react to them?
评论 #36646628 未加载