TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Which companies would benefit from a shift to nuclear power?

1 点作者 parisivy将近 2 年前
Apparently, 76% of the US public favors nuclear energy in 2023 compared with 49% in the 1983.<p>Which public companies would stand to gain the most?

3 条评论

PaulHoule将近 2 年前
Winners in the industry. Who that’s going to be is not so clear.<p>General Electric is getting a lot of early interest in the BWRX300 but it is based on the ESBWR which got no firm orders and the previous ABWR sold very few units.<p>There are not many orders in the west for large LWRs (Russia is the only country that is building them on an n-th-of-a-kind basis today) and those are all running terribly late. The economics of the LWR will never be great, even if the constructibility problems are solved. China is far along on the ACP100 small LWR and there is Nuscale, that BWRX300 and some others. Such a machine might get to an nth-of-a-kind basis for constructibility but the economics on paper usually aren’t better than the large LWR though the hope is somehow you can delete something from the design and still have good safety.<p>The economics may not have to be great if the social price of carbon is added to fossil fuels and if the current level of exuberance over renewables subsides (say storage turns out to be as hard as we thought it was in 2000, or building more power lines takes as long as building large LWRs, …)<p>Then there is<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Generation_IV_reactor" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Generation_IV_reactor</a><p>which <i>might</i> improve on the economics because the steam turbine is a major weight on the LWR. In principle a reactor without water can operate at much higher temperatures and power a closed-cycle gas turbine or maybe make hydrogen directly with a thermochemical process. None of those is a bird in the hand neither in terms of the nuclear part nor the “what are you going to do with the heat?” question.
评论 #36847428 未加载
pfdietz将近 2 年前
Only 35% of Americans believe the government should encourage production of nuclear power. In constrast, 72% answer affirmatively for the same question about wind and solar.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;short-reads&#x2F;2022&#x2F;03&#x2F;23&#x2F;americans-continue-to-express-mixed-views-about-nuclear-power&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;short-reads&#x2F;2022&#x2F;03&#x2F;23&#x2F;americans...</a>
pfdietz将近 2 年前
What exactly was the poll question used to conclude 76% of the US public favors nuclear energy?
评论 #36819406 未加载