> "For most customers, the existence of this rooting solution should not be a big issue. It would take considerable technical knowledge and physical access for a moderate period of time for an attacker to be able to carry out this attack."<p>Is this glossing over the concept of replacing an existing unit with a rooted unit? Enemy realizes you have one of these in your house. They break into your house while you're gone and replace your existing one with their hacked one.<p>Edit to clarify: It sounds like the responses to my comment are missing what I'm focused on. My point isn't about the feasibility or sanity of such the idea that I gave as an example. My point is about the OP skipping over other possibilities as a justification for their action.