TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Government URLs that don't end in .gov

155 点作者 notmysql_将近 2 年前

24 条评论

samwillis将近 2 年前
I think it&#x27;s particularly interesting that the US use .gov and not .gov.us (as a Brit). I&#x27;m sure there are oversights on who can acquire an inherently international .gov domain, but for example here in the UK .gov.uk domains have a strict application process [0] managed by central government.<p>It just seems to me that it would be more secure, and more reassuring to citizens and visitors that they are on the correct site it&#x27;s under a cctld that&#x27;s clearly affiliated to and managed by that government.<p>0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gov.uk&#x2F;apply-for-and-manage-a-gov-uk-domain-name" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gov.uk&#x2F;apply-for-and-manage-a-gov-uk-domain-name</a><p>--<p>Edit: turns out .gov is exclusively for the US, not sure I feel good about that, particularly as <i>.com and .net are very much not just for the US</i>.<p>The possibility of the US government creating a .gov specifically to confuse uses in a foreign country isn&#x27;t ideal.<p>I get it, you invented the internet, but the special status you have over it is a little frustrating.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.whitehouse.gov&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2023&#x2F;02&#x2F;M-23-10-DOTGOV-Act-Guidance.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.whitehouse.gov&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2023&#x2F;02&#x2F;M-23-1...</a>
评论 #36836907 未加载
评论 #36837086 未加载
评论 #36837946 未加载
评论 #36836897 未加载
评论 #36836868 未加载
评论 #36836957 未加载
评论 #36836877 未加载
评论 #36838520 未加载
评论 #36839378 未加载
评论 #36836979 未加载
评论 #36838370 未加载
评论 #36838006 未加载
评论 #36841225 未加载
评论 #36837156 未加载
评论 #36837801 未加载
评论 #36841269 未加载
评论 #36836898 未加载
评论 #36836980 未加载
评论 #36840148 未加载
gr33nq将近 2 年前
I went through the process of registering a .gov domain recently and it definitely takes a couple of months. It requires a letter of intent, wet signatures from elected official(s) on official letterhead, a phone call to a publicly listed number of an elected official, 2FA enrollment for the management of DNS&#x2F;WHOIS, and a period of time in between some of these steps for some behind-the-scenes verification to take place. Despite the many steps, I did find it relatively straightforward and appropriate given the exclusivity of the TLD. In fact, the most difficult part (that I&#x27;m still working through) is convincing management that we should make the full migration to the .gov now that we have it registered...
评论 #36837047 未加载
topkai22将近 2 年前
Briefly scrolling through the the list for really weird ones and “ war-on-pineapple.com” jumped out at me.<p>Turns out it’s not a USDA campaign, but is associated with a CISA campaign to explain foreign influence operations focused on divisiveness.<p>CISA produced a quite good one pager: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cisa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;publications&#x2F;19_1008_cisa_the-war-on-pineapple-understanding-foreign-interference-in-5-steps.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cisa.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;publications&#x2F;19_100...</a><p>Sadly the domain is inactive, but they helpfully included an archive.org to show some of the additional content (how the CISA director executed a pineapple op on Twitter): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20190726194709&#x2F;https:&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;CISAKrebs&#x2F;status&#x2F;1154462806311235584" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20190726194709&#x2F;https:&#x2F;twitter.co...</a><p>And for the record- pepperoni pineapple jalapeño pizza is delicious.
captn3m0将近 2 年前
Interesting related thing from India: the official TLDs as per the guidelines are .gov.in and .nic.in, and both are registered as a public suffix (legacy, from when the list was created).<p>However the government created a separate Section 8 company called Digital India corporation that runs a separate group of websites for Citizen Outreach called MyGov, which runs a separate subdomain for these: mygov.in. Unfortunately, they haven’t gotten around to registering it as a public suffix, so there are concerns around security (cookies are shared between completely separate sites). The public suffix list doesn’t accept contributions without authorisation anymore, so it’s unlikely to be fixed.<p>There’s also the interesting case of some government sites preferring .org.in to showcase independence from government interference- RBI, for eg (the central bank) runs at rbi.org.in.<p>I wrote a few more findings when I created a list back in 2020: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;captn3m0&#x2F;status&#x2F;1301613472615030784" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;captn3m0&#x2F;status&#x2F;1301613472615030784</a>
评论 #36861928 未加载
seeknotfind将近 2 年前
We need a government root CA more than a government TLD. Domain names aren&#x27;t even the only thing we should attest.
评论 #36836818 未加载
评论 #36836821 未加载
评论 #36837081 未加载
评论 #36836817 未加载
graypegg将近 2 年前
I’ve always thought it was weird that the Canadian federal government uses canada.ca almost exclusively. You see a lot of<p><pre><code> https:&#x2F;&#x2F;service-service.canada.ca&#x2F;sign-up-sinscrire.aspx </code></pre> .ca is open for registration by anyone, and people are used to seeing that TLD. Combine that with the bilingual super long domain names and every once in a while you’ll see a phishing scam like:<p><pre><code> https:&#x2F;&#x2F;service-service-canada.ca&#x2F;sign-up-sinscrire.aspx </code></pre> CIRA could set up a .gov.ca second level or something if they really wanted to keep the .ca, but I don’t think that will happen at this point.<p>It’s at least consistant in looking like a phishing scam!
评论 #36837032 未加载
评论 #36836905 未加载
评论 #36837160 未加载
sebmellen将近 2 年前
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;war-on-pineapple.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;war-on-pineapple.com</a> is purportedly owned by the Department of Homeland Security. It’s a dead link, unfortunately. What a curious domain!<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;GSA&#x2F;govt-urls&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;2_govt_urls_federal_only.csv">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;GSA&#x2F;govt-urls&#x2F;blob&#x2F;main&#x2F;2_govt_urls_feder...</a>
评论 #36841762 未加载
cloudripper将近 2 年前
Interesting to see both the Minnesota House of Representatives and State Senate using the ccTLD of Mongolia.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.house.mn" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.house.mn</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.senate.mn" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.senate.mn</a>
评论 #36841425 未加载
brown将近 2 年前
My favorite URL oddity has to be &quot;id.me&quot; for U.S. Citizen identity services.<p>Seems a bit odd to use a Montenegro domain, doesn&#x27;t it?
评论 #36839579 未加载
评论 #36838876 未加载
remram将近 2 年前
I got an official email from New York State&#x27;s Office Of The Comptroller with a link to osc.state.ny.us. It came from an email address @osc.ny.gov. I don&#x27;t understand why they couldn&#x27;t use an official TLD in the URL too.
评论 #36837166 未加载
评论 #36836935 未加载
评论 #36836970 未加载
评论 #36839513 未加载
syncsynchalt将近 2 年前
The most egregious of these to me is moneyfactory.com (the Bureau of Engraving &amp; Printing).<p>It reads as very low-rent considering it&#x27;s the printing press of the US Dollar. If they reached out to me I&#x27;d think it was a weak scam.
评论 #36840353 未加载
评论 #36838499 未加载
评论 #36839694 未加载
评论 #36839128 未加载
eduction将近 2 年前
[makes an authoritative list of non gov federal sites so you know you can trust them even though they’re not at dot gov]<p>[puts that list at a non dot gov website]
SeanLuke将近 2 年前
My favorite is definitely Smithsonian. They&#x27;re very, very proud that they are <i>si.edu</i>.
KolmogorovComp将近 2 年前
Title should state &quot;US Government...&quot;
评论 #36836827 未加载
评论 #36837173 未加载
the_svd_doctor将近 2 年前
“annualcreditreport.com” is in the list but it’s not a government website. It’s run by a lovely alliance from equifax&#x2F;transunion&#x2F;experian, asking you to check the info they hold on you to avoid other people stealing money from banks.
评论 #36842669 未加载
YPPH将近 2 年前
Very odd indeed. In Australia, government departments almost always use .gov.au unless there are exceptional reasons. In the States, it is .[state].gov.au, eg .nsw.gov.au.
rig666将近 2 年前
A few years ago I was hired on at my local sheriff&#x27;s department and I was so disappointed that we did not have a dot gov domain.
评论 #36837021 未加载
user__name将近 2 年前
Here are all domains, extracted: 94 army as biz cc cfm ch cn co com com de Domain name edu gov gu helenapj htm info int io me mn mobi mp ms net nl online org org pr sc tips travel tv tw us vg vi wiki ws xyz
ulrischa将近 2 年前
Gov is a horrible because it is exclusively for US. It would be better if all governmental intitutions in the world could have a gov domain. Much better trust and verification
评论 #36838874 未加载
nodesocket将近 2 年前
tva.com. That&#x27;s gotta be worth some money now.
vladharbuz将近 2 年前
Always found it arbitrary that .gov is only for use by the US.
评论 #36836901 未加载
评论 #36837434 未加载
dudeinjapan将近 2 年前
So every time the FBI&#x2F;CIA sets up a domain for a sting operation it has to be listed here? Seems like an Achilles&#x27; heel, no?
评论 #36837224 未加载
评论 #36836908 未加载
xwdv将近 2 年前
It’d be more interesting to see a list of sites that end in .gov but aren’t government associated. I feel like the creation of such a site would involve some inside connections and shady backroom deals.
xn--cr8h将近 2 年前
Sort of funny that the README never mentions <i>which</i> government they&#x27;re talking about. Classic USA trying to make sure everyone knows they&#x27;re the most important country in the history of planet Earth
评论 #36837384 未加载
评论 #36839239 未加载
评论 #36841936 未加载
评论 #36841013 未加载