Elixir is still safe

Without stepping on anyone’s toes, I think we can agree that “safety” could be broken down a bit. Memory safety, thread safety, fine… but there’s a whole forest past those trees.<p>Is it a safety feature to type-check regular expressions using dependent types? Is Python a security vulnerability because the performance can be unpredictable?<p>I don’t know.<p>Rust, for that matter, doesn’t protect you from running out of memory from leaking data on the heap — or from running out of stack space because your infinitely recursive function doesn’t halt. Maybe that’s not part of memory safety — but that’s my point.<p>There’s a whole safety forest out there. Whenever I read an article about safety in software, it seems like a comfy blanket statement. “This is a nice definition which I will live in.”<p>I just don’t see how it’s so flat.

What would normally be the process to debunk a published paper? Simply publishing another paper debunking it in the same journal?

&gt; Practitioner perceptions are formed through personal experience, and not based on empirical evidence<p>The disagreement here is rooted in the empirical worldview. Empirically, &quot;rarely&quot; and &quot;never&quot; cannot be (reliably) distinguished, and so adherents of this worldview fail to distinguish claims which are meant to distinguish them.

Deciding which i should use : Elixir or Clojurescript or python or nodejs