Non-paywalled link to the Bloomberg article linked at the top of the OP describing Eilon's elevation from digital director to deputy campaign manager: <a href="https://archive.is/dxPks" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://archive.is/dxPks</a><p>There's disturbing context in that given his role as digital director, Eilon could not have been completely unaware of other digital staffers on the team elevating Nazi imagery: <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/desantis-staff-keep-sharing-twitter-page-that-makes-nazi-memes" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.thedailybeast.com/desantis-staff-keep-sharing-tw...</a><p>And the net neutrality fiasco takes on an entirely more rancid flavor when it turns out that anti-net neutrality was being pushed by a team now actively promoting fascism and transphobia. It's one thing to worry that an ISP might favor one video streaming site over another for <i>commercial</i> gain; it's another when many regional and national ISPs would take relaxed net neutrality rules as a free license, with the tacit if not explicit approval and protection of a presidential candidate, and with coordinated messaging alongside a nationally elevated "protecting children" narrative, to create a <i>"soft Great Firewall"</i> that throttles content on sites that its operators don't politically agree with.<p>If you don't want a regime (in all definitions of the word) where this is not only plausible but a likely strategy, now is the time to make your voice heard to protect a society in which ideas can be transmitted freely.