TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why GPT is so better in Rust than copilot?

3 点作者 odedbend将近 2 年前
I thought that both should use a similar engine (OpenAI). If there is a difference, then Copilot should be better because it is trained for code and has context. But when I've checked GPT is much better.. Can anyone explain this?

4 条评论

ezedv将近 2 年前
From my research, GPT has a broader knowledge base, enabling it to generate more accurate and contextually relevant suggestions. However, Copilot&#x27;s focus on code might make it more specialized in certain cases. It&#x27;d be interesting to see real-world comparisons to understand the nuances better.<p>Found this article, it might be interesting: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ratherlabs.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;how-to-hire-rust-and-solidity-developers" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ratherlabs.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;how-to-hire-rust-and-solidit...</a>
satvikpendem将近 2 年前
Copilot is a much older model than GPT 3.5 even, so there&#x27;s no surprise that it&#x27;s worse. Thankfully Copilot will be upgraded to GPT 4 soon, Microsoft said.
ilaksh将近 2 年前
Please be more precise. You should say ChatGPT if you mean that product. Also specify which model, GPT-3.5 or GPT-4.<p>Short answer is they use different models.
throwawayadvsec将近 2 年前
do you mean copilot autocompletion or the crappy chat copilot in beta?<p>you&#x27;re not prompting copilot that&#x27;s one reason