TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians

183 点作者 akolbe将近 2 年前

10 条评论

mschuster91将近 2 年前
&gt; An eyewitness interviewed by Indy Week alleged that Durham council member DeDreana Freeman had attempted to strike Durham Mayor-pro tempore and council member Mark-Anthony Middleton during the shouting session, but instead struck O&#x27;Neal once and punched the head of fellow Durham council member Leonardo Williams twice before Williams subdued her. In the aftermath of these incidents, O&#x27;Neal announced that she would not seek re-election as Mayor and a state investigation was opened into the extortion allegation (Holsey-Hyman denies the alleged extortion attempt and a separate allegation that she ordered city employees to perform campaign work on her behalf).<p>Wtf. That alone is <i>wild</i>, open brawls in parliament are usually something associated with dysfunctional democracies. Attempting to censor that and invite the Streisand effect? That&#x27;s new. If you decide to throw fists in politics, at least don&#x27;t attempt to contradict the evidence. JFC.
评论 #36962377 未加载
评论 #36969421 未加载
评论 #36961866 未加载
kotaKat将近 2 年前
It&#x27;s as if the city council decided to drive right into their own bridge[1] and now we get to watch the chaos unfolding all the same.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;11foot8.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;11foot8.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #36960014 未加载
评论 #36961452 未加载
评论 #36960192 未加载
评论 #36960406 未加载
评论 #36965999 未加载
评论 #36960662 未加载
评论 #36960975 未加载
评论 #36963038 未加载
rdtsc将近 2 年前
&gt; The WMF told Indy Week that they had not received the letter and that the letter that had been made public contained an incorrect postal address for the WMF&#x27;s headquarters<p>I wonder if the lawyer did it on purpose. They&#x27;ve probably had enough dealing with an unreasonable client so they made a few &quot;mistakes&quot; to blow the case up so the city can get a new official and they won&#x27;t have to deal with them any longer.<p>If you listen to the linked video of the official yelling obscenities and acting unprofessionally, imagine working for them. On one hand, they&#x27;ll do what they are told, on the other, mistakes &quot;just happen&quot;. And look at that, they are not seeking re-election any longer, sounds like a &quot;win&quot; for the attorney.
评论 #36966480 未加载
BizarroLand将近 2 年前
This was a good read, it was nice how they put the contested signature top right and prominent and also clearly reiterated the story the mayor tried to squash.
veave将近 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;9&#x2F;99&#x2F;Elaine_O%27Neal.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;9&#x2F;99&#x2F;Elaine_O...</a>
kornhole将近 2 年前
This is an interesting read of some of the politics around editing of Wikipedia, but the problem is much bigger. This show interviewing the founder dropped last night and covers many of the problems as well as some potential solutions to decentralize the knowledge and search capabilities such as encycloreader.org. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rumble.com&#x2F;v33wemb-wikipedia-co-founder-condemns-it-most-biased-encyclopedia-in-history-system.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rumble.com&#x2F;v33wemb-wikipedia-co-founder-condemns-it-...</a>
axus将近 2 年前
The topic after Durham was about RuWiki. Apparently the director of &quot;Wikimedia Russia&quot; was banned from making edits due to &quot;Long-term abuse: creating a Wikipedia fork which includes stolen content from Commons as well&quot;.<p>I get that pushing a state-sponsored, censored clone of Wikipedia is bad for free information, but it seems out of scope of the real Wikipedia. Stealing information from Wikipedia is a bad thing, by itself?
评论 #36965791 未加载
评论 #36966748 未加载
pityJuke将近 2 年前
Is there a way to get an RSS feed for just &quot;The Signpost&quot;? Really interesting read.
评论 #36960105 未加载
评论 #36960155 未加载
vorpalhex将近 2 年前
I wonder if havig a name and shame website, with a copy of the material they want removed, would be valuable and not just cathartic.<p>Props on Wikimedia Foundation for doing it right.
评论 #36960513 未加载
bloopernova将近 2 年前
Edited to add: they were apparently born in 1969, I&#x27;ve spent too much time online, and I enthusiastically leapt to the wrong conclusion.<p>Original comment follows:<p>The lawyer who sent the letter has the wikipedia username &quot;kimlynn69&quot;.<p>You&#x27;d think that a lawyer, engaging in actions on behalf of a client, would use a more professional username.
评论 #36960508 未加载
评论 #36960515 未加载