TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Essay on Structure of Consciousness

4 点作者 jacknobody将近 2 年前
Perhaps: Atoms are conscious.<p>Atoms are conscious of their neighbours - especially the ones they are bonded with.<p>A pair of bonded atoms - a compound - is conscious in itself, so the simplest compound has 3 consciousnesses associated with it. The 2 atoms and the compound are separate, harmoniously functioning, and separately self-aware.<p>Consciousnesses, in communication with one another, can sometimes aggregate into larger structures, such that the whole is separate from the contributing parts.<p>(We all know that some things are fun and enjoyable, but the fundamental joy of life is knowing that we&#x27;re alive and able to love one another. How would it feel to be an atom? Do atoms know themselves to exist - do atoms love?)<p>Is each atom connected to every other atom in the cosmos?<p>Consider the matter from the other end. The conscious Cosmos knows itself to have arisen as the emergent consequence of the interaction between many smaller parts - say, galactic clusters. A few et ceteras follow, and we once again consider atoms.<p>At every level, and according to its capacity, that-which-is knows itself to be.<p>Admittedly wheelbarrows might not be conscious :) Just because you can think of a thing, doesn&#x27;t force that thing to have real meaning.<p>Then everything meaningful is conscious, for the entire universe is made of conscious atoms.

2 条评论

mindcrime将近 2 年前
Sounds like a form of panpsychism[1]. You might also find some interesting stuff in Monism[2] and&#x2F;or IIT[3].<p>If you&#x27;re not already familiar with Douglas Hofstadter&#x27;s works, you might also find GEB[4] and&#x2F;or <i>I Am A Strange Loop</i>[5] to be of interest.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Panpsychism" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Panpsychism</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Monism" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Monism</a><p>[3]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Integrated_information_theory" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Integrated_information_theory</a><p>[4]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach</a><p>[5]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;I_Am_a_Strange_Loop" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;I_Am_a_Strange_Loop</a>
pabloem1234将近 2 年前
hm? the series of reasoning in your post is loosely connected at each step. And the very first statement is also a claim without any support.<p>This works more as a poem than as an essay.
评论 #36974541 未加载
评论 #36976531 未加载