TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The end-of-pilot report from using Khan Academy for 80-90% of class time[pdf]

42 点作者 aundumla大约 13 年前

2 条评论

EzGraphs大约 13 年前
To Quote Martin Fowler<p>"Often when you come across something new it can be a good idea to overuse it in order to find out it's boundaries. This is a quite reasonable learning strategy. It's also why people always tend to overuse new technologies or techniques in the early days. People often criticize this but it's a natural part of learning. "<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;rct=j&#38;q=&#38;esrc=s&#38;source=web&#38;cd=8&#38;cts=1331730135496&#38;ved=0CFsQFjAH&#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmartinfowler.com%2Farticles%2Frake.html&#38;ei=x5ZgT7WDFMrl0QGRmd2RBw&#38;usg=AFQjCNF4PjGt8mT_6udz3lqVZNyOUnGGDQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;rct=j&#38;q=&#38;esrc=s&#...</a><p>It is good to see some studies being done in this area (even if the one in the article is not particularly rigorous). I am convinced that there is tremendous value in the new online opportunities (Khan Academy, Stanford, Coursera, Udacity, etc), but there are limits to what they can accomplish. For one thing, an online course being done individually requires a higher level of student discipline than a learning activity involving the personal interaction of a teacher. My mind is less likely to wander when a teacher is staring me down :).
评论 #3703048 未加载
perlgeek大约 13 年前
The increased test scores of 6.4% in contrast to 5.2% in the control group sounds like it could be purely noise, especially since I couldn't find the value for the standard deviations of these numbers.<p>The difference is so small that even if it's not noise, it could be very well caused by other factors (teachers more motivated in the test group, for example).
评论 #3703218 未加载
评论 #3703413 未加载
评论 #3703318 未加载