TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Glenn Greenwald on Wikipedia's Neutrality

14 点作者 akolbe将近 2 年前

4 条评论

Bluescreenbuddy将近 2 年前
Greenwald is a nut. Let's not give him attention.
评论 #37136901 未加载
akolbe将近 2 年前
Since Hunter Biden is mentioned tangentially in the piece, this was published today by Lee Fang, another former Intercept contributor:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.leefang.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;emails-show-hunter-biden-hired-specialists" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.leefang.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;emails-show-hunter-biden-hired-spe...</a><p>Fang claims emails show Hunter Biden hired PR specialists to whitewash Wikipedia&#x27;s coverage of him.
powera将近 2 年前
As is so often the case, the Signpost is trying too hard to be clever and sarcastic, and we have a worthless piece as a result.
sdfghswe将近 2 年前
Glenn Greenwald really went off the deep end.<p>In retrospect, Sam Harris nailed him down exactly right from day one. (paraphrasing) &quot;Glenn Greenwald didn&#x27;t do great journalistic work on his own merit. Glenn Greenwald is just the guy that Snowden happened to choose&quot;. Hopefully it should be obvious to everyone now that Glenn Greenwald didn&#x27;t do anything of merit before or since, but I find it remarkable that Sam Harris managed to have the foresight to make this comment shortly after the Snowden leaks.
评论 #37136989 未加载
评论 #37138497 未加载
评论 #37137689 未加载