TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Arguments that are too clever for their own good

5 点作者 rayvega大约 13 年前

3 条评论

dstorrs大约 13 年前
Galileo's argument is actually quite slipshod and is based on the ambiguity of language and the narrowness of what-we-commonly-experience as a slice of all-that-really-is.<p>If Aristotle were right then the rocks would EITHER fall slower or faster together. There is no "knowing" if they are one object or two.<p>But Aristotle is wrong. Which means Galileo's thought experiment is irrelevant to reality and should be ignored. The picture is very simple: gravity pulls down, air resistance pushes up. Gravity is constant but air resistance is higher for faster moving objects. That's all you need.
评论 #3721213 未加载
VMG大约 13 年前
link changed: <a href="http://cstheory.blogoverflow.com/2012/03/arguments-that-are-too-clever-for-their-own-good/" rel="nofollow">http://cstheory.blogoverflow.com/2012/03/arguments-that-are-...</a>
twiceaday大约 13 年前
Article fails to deliver on the premise.