TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Close to the Machine: Technophilia and its discontents

215 点作者 manuhortet将近 2 年前

18 条评论

jfarmer将近 2 年前
This is a great book and I quote this 1998 article she wrote for Salon all the time: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.salon.com&#x2F;1998&#x2F;05&#x2F;12&#x2F;feature_321&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.salon.com&#x2F;1998&#x2F;05&#x2F;12&#x2F;feature_321&#x2F;</a><p>&quot;The dumbing-down of programming&quot;<p>&gt; The computer was suddenly revealed as palimpsest. The machine that is everywhere hailed as the very incarnation of the new had revealed itself to be not so new after all, but a series of skins, layer on layer, winding around the messy, evolving idea of the computing machine. Under Windows was DOS; under DOS, BASIC; and under them both the date of its origins recorded like a birth memory. Here was the very opposite of the authoritative, all-knowing system with its pretty screenful of icons. Here was the antidote to Microsoft&#x27;s many protections. The mere impulse toward Linux had led me into an act of desktop archaeology. <i>And down under all those piles of stuff, the secret was written: We build our computers the way we build our cities -- over time, without a plan, on top of ruins.</i><p>I repeat the last sentence to my students all the time (&quot;We build our computers the way we build our cities -- over time, without a plan, on top of ruins.&quot;)<p>There&#x27;s no way to understand why our computers work the way they do without understanding the human, social, and economic factors involved in their production. And foregrounding the human element often makes it easier to explain what&#x27;s going on and why.
评论 #37222754 未加载
评论 #37222678 未加载
评论 #37230979 未加载
评论 #37224991 未加载
评论 #37223546 未加载
manuhortet将近 2 年前
I recently read Ellen Ullman&#x27;s memoir about her life as a software developer in the dot-com bubble era: &quot;Close to the machine: Technophilia and its discontents&quot;.<p>The book was written before I was born, but I can still closely relate to most of the cultural points made. She does a great job defining the anxieties and frictions you experience working in the duality of the very formal computer systems and the subjective, messy working contexts, filled with deadlines, bureaucracy, &quot;rockstars&quot;...<p>Her takes on the internet are also super relevant today. A favorite extract of mine: &quot;When I watch the users try the Internet, it slowly becomes clear to me that the Net represents the ultimate dumbing-down of the computer. The users seem to believe that they are connected to some vast treasure trove — all the knowledge of our times, an endless digitized compendium, some electronic library of Alexandria — if only they could figure out how to use it. But they just sit and click, and look disconcertedly at the junk that comes back at them&quot;.<p>What other similar books would you recommend?
评论 #37222182 未加载
评论 #37222683 未加载
评论 #37223403 未加载
评论 #37223398 未加载
评论 #37223375 未加载
评论 #37223148 未加载
评论 #37222165 未加载
评论 #37230253 未加载
评论 #37229499 未加载
评论 #37231227 未加载
评论 #37230599 未加载
0xbadcafebee将近 2 年前
&gt; How much of this is impostor syndrome and how much reality? How different are other fields really? I also feel any new programming task as something foreign, for which I am not ready, basically undoable from my position. But at the same time consider myself able to get into anything and everything, and of fixing and building whatever that can be done. I cannot figure out any straight explanation for such senseless duality, nor feel I adopt the same position for anything else in life.<p>I believe this is a side-effect of the &quot;creative&quot; aspect of computer programming. Creative jobs tend to have impostor syndrome, because there is no piece of paper that you receive that says &quot;this person is 100% certified to be a song writer&quot; or whatever that creative job is. Since software engineering also has no paper certificate, apprenticeship, mastership, etc, there is no proof that you know what you are doing, and it&#x27;s all a little too loosey-goosey &quot;figure it out for that one job&quot;. There&#x27;s no certainty that you&#x27;re doing it right.<p>A Computer Science degree is about as much evidence of you knowing what you&#x27;re doing as a warranty on a hammer and chisel is evidence that you know how to cut wood joints. Software engineering is a trade, completely distinct from Computer Science. That&#x27;s why so many people in the industry don&#x27;t need a degree. You learn the trade on the job.<p>It&#x27;s just bizarre that we don&#x27;t have apprenticeships or trade organizations to ratify someone as a Real Programmer(TM). I can hire someone with 3 years experience working as a programmer and they&#x27;ll turn out to be almost incompetent. That shouldn&#x27;t be possible, especially for a job that pays $140,000. But I guess it happens with construction contractors too, so maybe it&#x27;s not surprising?
评论 #37224338 未加载
评论 #37223131 未加载
评论 #37224852 未加载
评论 #37226388 未加载
评论 #37223207 未加载
评论 #37227432 未加载
doctorhandshake将近 2 年前
Back when syntax was a challenge for me and documentation more scarce generally, and, perhaps even more than I’d like to admit to this day, I find myself mentally thinking of programming as ‘begging a computer to do things.’
评论 #37222101 未加载
评论 #37222086 未加载
评论 #37222896 未加载
Tomte将近 2 年前
From &#x27;Life in Code&#x27;:<p>&quot;We build our computers the way we build our cities—over time, without a plan, on top of ruins.&quot;
评论 #37222378 未加载
评论 #37222622 未加载
评论 #37223129 未加载
评论 #37229468 未加载
评论 #37227502 未加载
评论 #37222655 未加载
danielovichdk将近 2 年前
Close to the Machine: Technophilia and Its Discontents <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Close-Machine-Technophilia-Its-Discontents&#x2F;dp&#x2F;1250002486" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Close-Machine-Technophilia-Its-Discon...</a>
hax0ron3将近 2 年前
&gt;The project begins in the programmer’s mind with the beauty of a crystal. The knowledge I am to represent in code seems lovely in its structuredness. For a time, the world is a calm, mathematical place. […] Yes, I understand. Yes, it can be done. Yes, how straightforward. Oh yes. I see. […] Then something happens. The irregularities of human thinking start to emerge.<p>It&#x27;s ok, so-called &quot;software development methodologies&quot; solve this problem by making sure that the project begins in the programmer&#x27;s mind in just as chaotic and irregular a state as it will eventually end up once the code has been written.
dusted将近 2 年前
This looks like a review or comment on something, that Ellen wrote, but I&#x27;ve no idea what, it does not link to anything ?
评论 #37222564 未加载
评论 #37222862 未加载
评论 #37222649 未加载
评论 #37222122 未加载
sebstefan将近 2 年前
I think I&#x27;m one onanistic &quot;article about engineers (from an engineer)&quot; away from completely losing it
评论 #37225136 未加载
jbl将近 2 年前
FWIW - I found &quot;The Bug&quot;, by Ellen Ullman, to be a really engrossing piece of fiction to read. I wasn&#x27;t aware she&#x27;d authored other works. I&#x27;ll have to check them out!
评论 #37222713 未加载
zer8k将近 2 年前
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catb.org&#x2F;~esr&#x2F;jargon&#x2F;html&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catb.org&#x2F;~esr&#x2F;jargon&#x2F;html&#x2F;index.html</a><p>Nothing will beat the Jargon File.
darkwater将近 2 年前
Side note for the author: your LinkedIn link is broken (it looks like it was parsed as a relative link to your blog, rather than an absolute one)
评论 #37223151 未加载
ggm将近 2 年前
The wikipedia for Ellen doesn&#x27;t mention Jeffrey Ullman by name. Is there a reason which people prefer not to refer to, which explains why the coyness, or was it some other computer science Ullman which adopted Ellen? It does state she was raised in a computer science family.<p>People deserve to stand on their own two legs, and if its &quot;not in the shadow, shines by herself&quot; I can get behind that. Or indeed &quot;no, it&#x27;s just a coincidence, the adoptive parent isn&#x27;t Jeffrey and his partner&quot;<p>(I too was raised in a computer science family, 3 generations now. In my own case, regression tended to the mean but I have high hopes of the next one.)
Minor49er将近 2 年前
I read this book years ago. One part that I still think about from time to time is how the author was approached for a job that entailed maintaining an ancient mainframe. Despite the pay being so high, the mainframe and its model were dying. Both her and the employer knew this. The author turned the job down just because it seemed like it would have been an unfulfilling and depressing endeavor, despite the high pay. It reminds me that sometimes, a line must be drawn between pay and self-fulfillment
forkerenok将近 2 年前
I haven&#x27;t read the book, but the quotes do really read as timeless.<p>I was in my early teens during dot-com era, but without a PC yet and still an &quot;internet virgin&quot;.<p>One question that really tickles my curiosity is how much the spoils of the dot-com era shaped the direction of the free software in the next decade?<p>When looking at (the aged) projects under Apache umbrella, it seems a lot of them kicked off around that time. Is that because of the dot-com money or because Java graduated to a different stage around that time?
评论 #37228109 未加载
dimatura将近 2 年前
I encountered Close to the Machine by chance in my university&#x27;s library, many years ago. I flipped through the first few pages and was quickly hooked. Definitely a great read.
polynomial将近 2 年前
Hmm, the 1st&#x2F;top link in TFA (to the book in question on Good Reads) appears to be broken(?)
somewhat_drunk将近 2 年前
I think you mean accurate, not precise.