TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why are commercial airplanes still so slow?

9 点作者 reset2023超过 1 年前
Whatever happened to supersonic commercial flights? It takes so long to get anywhere on an airplane and it 2023, their speed is still the same as 80 years ago.

8 条评论

logicalmonster超过 1 年前
Would it be nice if planes went faster and you could cut maybe an hour from a cross country flight? Sure.<p>But to me at least, the speed is the smallest issues with airplane travel.<p>The bigger issue is that it&#x27;s just a miserable user experience all the way around: finding and buying tickets, going through security, boarding the plane, eating and being entertained on the plane, sitting in bad chairs, unpleasant bathrooms, and then you get to the general societal increase in mental illness meaning you might have to deal with some onboard drama, etc.<p>I&#x27;d prefer to drive anywhere that&#x27;s not over an ocean these days even if the flight was at Mach 10.
评论 #37249214 未加载
评论 #37238020 未加载
throwaway154超过 1 年前
Why don&#x27;t we have slower air travel?<p>Eighty years ago we didn&#x27;t have laptops to work from, or global connectivity. Now, we do. I&#x27;m thinking about <i>total time</i>, not <i>only the travel time part</i>.<p>Thinking <i>total time</i>, I can leave the office a day in advance as my 6 hour flight of 3000 miles now takes 20 hours. I can spend an evening in a large properly convertible chair&#x2F;bed, have a stroll around the next day, perhaps enjoy the observation deck or a sit-down meal. I can have a proper day&#x27;s work while on the move, watch a movie in comfort, have another sleep adjusting to timezone, and arrive at the destination in great comfort.<p>Instead of chasing speed, why are we not chasing that? It could be an airship. It could be a hydrofoil at sea or in waterways. It could be a train! It&#x27;s a superior form of travel.
throw9away6超过 1 年前
Physics and regulations. Cost of fuel is high so you want to fly for efficiency not flight hours. Going super Sonic wastes a lot of fuel, you can go a bit faster trans sonic for 10%-15 speed boost but the economics don’t pencil out.<p>Besides due to regulations a lot of airline design is stuck in the 60s&#x2F;70s as redesign to modern standards is insanely expensive.
tuckerpo超过 1 年前
Commercial airliners are plenty fast.<p>Flying is a nightmare due to everything that is _not_ sitting on a plane. Booking, checking-in, dealing with labyrinth airport layouts, needing to walk literally miles to your gate in some instances, your own government treating you like a career criminal ala TSA, etc.<p>Sitting on the plane and going to sleep for a few hours is the best part of the whole ordeal.
评论 #37255824 未加载
galenmarchetti超过 1 年前
The Concorde had a lot of issues with getting permits to fly overland due to sonic booms disturbing residential areas, so was limited to flight paths primarily over the ocean...which hurt the usability of the plane a lot. Add in fuel inefficiency (not sure if this is still the case given progress in aerospace engineering?).<p>Maybe aerospace engineering experts can weigh in on the fuel inefficiency issues, but definitely the combination of cost + limited flight paths made supersonic commercial flights nonviable from a business perspective
评论 #37229252 未加载
cratermoon超过 1 年前
The answer is physics and wave drag. Why Aren&#x27;t Commercial Jets Getting Faster? (Hank Green) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=ZVLb0DRFKSY">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=ZVLb0DRFKSY</a>
mcdonje超过 1 年前
We&#x27;d be better served by trains. Airplanes are not efficient, and the security theater is annoying.
评论 #37249227 未加载
评论 #37252125 未加载
chaimanmeow超过 1 年前
if anything they should be slower. propjets for anything under 500 mi. maybe 700 mi even.