TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FreeBSD on Firecracker

346 点作者 jmmv超过 1 年前

11 条评论

garganzol超过 1 年前
I never really realized that Firecracker VM is a full-blown machine and not just some sort of a Linux container tech. At first, it may sound like an ineffective approach, but if you take a closer look on a real-world usage example such as fly.io, you will be surprised: micro-VMs are very small and capable.
评论 #37253975 未加载
评论 #37253646 未加载
评论 #37253676 未加载
评论 #37257124 未加载
评论 #37255117 未加载
评论 #37253677 未加载
评论 #37257605 未加载
nocarrier超过 1 年前
Once Colin's patches land on FreeBSD and Firecracker, the total boot time for the kernel is under 20ms. Absolutely incredible times that we live in.
评论 #37261099 未加载
mnsc超过 1 年前
Here&#x27;s the recent BSDCan talk from Colin that was posted a couple of days ago.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MT3cdeuRTzs?si=l6baNriUjcvy0ZOE" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MT3cdeuRTzs?si=l6baNriUjcvy0ZOE</a>
评论 #37255577 未加载
andrewstuart超过 1 年前
qemu has microvm, inspired by firecracker<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qemu.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;system&#x2F;i386&#x2F;microvm.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qemu.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;system&#x2F;i386&#x2F;microvm.ht...</a>
评论 #37255067 未加载
tedunangst超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s funny how many one second pauses turn out to be less than necessary. How many sysadmins took meaningful action because the system paused when they had an invalid machine uuid?
评论 #37255594 未加载
doublerabbit超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m not wanting to sound snoody. What use-cases do firecracker instances and the likes chime?<p>I use FreeBSD for everything from my colocated servers, to my own PC. By no means am I developer; seasoned Unix Admin at best. Bare-metal forever but welcome to the future. Especially anything that contributes to the OS.<p>However I hear buzz words like Lambda and Firecracker and really have no idea where the usage is. I get docker, containers, barely understand k8s but why do you need to spin up a VM only to tear it down compared to where you could just spin up a VM and use it when you really need to. Always there, always when.<p>Is it purely a cloud experience, cost saving exercise?
评论 #37254791 未加载
评论 #37254646 未加载
评论 #37255169 未加载
评论 #37254784 未加载
评论 #37254654 未加载
评论 #37265190 未加载
评论 #37255375 未加载
评论 #37254515 未加载
评论 #37254428 未加载
评论 #37255475 未加载
评论 #37254908 未加载
laurencerowe超过 1 年前
It&#x27;s a shame neither AWS nor macOS on ARM support nested virtualization. It would would make it far easier to develop and deploy Firecracker based tech.
评论 #37255395 未加载
评论 #37254832 未加载
ryanrussell超过 1 年前
Firecracker is amazing, but has a lot of edge cases that need documentation.<p>A huge thank you to Colin Percival for sharing this.<p>Particularly love the &quot;Once the low-hanging fruit was out of the way&quot; line... which to Colin means custom bus_dma patch(es).<p>Now anyone can now enjoy for free:<p>&quot;with 1 CPU and 128 MB of RAM, the FreeBSD kernel can boot in under 20 ms&quot;<p>If you&#x27;re used to devops with k8s clusters or lots of docker, this is absolutely amazing.
Havoc超过 1 年前
Toyed around with firecracker a bit. Does what it promises on boot times, but still a pretty gnarly experience. e.g. After doing a victory dance for getting it to boot I was rather deflated to find out that getting networking takes another lengthy tutorial
评论 #37259555 未加载
ruslan超过 1 年前
&gt; on a virtual machine with 1 CPU and 128 MB of RAM, the FreeBSD kernel can boot in under 20 ms;<p>Oh, my... how could I achieve the same on real hardware without VMs ? ;)
评论 #37259613 未加载
getcrunk超过 1 年前
So firecracker vs v8 isolates if only doing js or wasm?