The other stuff might be temperature, relative humidity, sun, wind, etc.<p>With more people suffering and dying from direct heat-related global warming conditions, I feel like we need a simpler way to talk about whether or not it is safe for people to go outside, for how long, etc., and I feel like the current reporting regime does not accomplish that.
I sometimes think that everything we discuss here is so much smaller when compared to global warming. But I am a believer in human ingenuity and think there will be a solution before things get too dire.
> With more people suffering and dying from direct heat-related global warming conditions,<p>I hate to be that guy, but maybe you should recheck some of your premises here because you're stating something that's really specific that might not be objectively factual.<p>This is a pretty complicated topic, but here's a starting point for investigation.<p><a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2020/08/27/why-deaths-from-hurricanes-and-other-natural-disasters-are-lower-than-ever/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2020/08/27...</a><p>> I feel like we need a simpler way to talk about whether or not it is safe for people to go outside, for how long, etc., and I feel like the current reporting regime does not accomplish that.<p>How is knowing a few basic weather statistics like the temperature, wind speed, precipitation, and a few others like that too confusing? I know how to look out of the window, look at the weather report, and dress myself like a big boy.<p>This feels more like an attempt to make idealogical propaganda than a genuine attempt to inform people.