TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cesium-soaked truffles may keep fallout in an environment’s food web

48 点作者 akolbe超过 1 年前

11 条评论

hedora超过 1 年前
Probably should link the original article. I wouldn’t have expected incorrect headlines and article summaries from Science, but here we are.<p>The original title is:<p>Disproportionately High Contributions of 60 Year Old Weapons-137Cs Explain the Persistence of Radioactive Contamination in Bavarian Wild Boars<p>The link is: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pubs.acs.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.est.3c03565" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pubs.acs.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;full&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.est.3c03565</a><p>From the abstract:<p>&gt; <i>Although Chornobyl has been widely believed to be the prime source of 137Cs in wild boars, we find that “old” 137Cs from weapons fallout significantly contributes to the total level (10–68%) in those specimens that exceeded the regulatory limit. In some cases, weapons-137Cs alone can lead to exceedances of the regulatory limit, especially in samples with a relatively low total 137Cs level. Our findings demonstrate that the superposition of older and newer legacies of 137Cs can vastly surpass the impact of any singular yet dominant source and thus highlight the critical role of historical releases of 137Cs in current environmental pollution challenges.</i>
评论 #37351504 未加载
z_ack超过 1 年前
I&#x27;m wondering why there is no measurement, no data about the radiation detected. All in our environment is a little bit radioactive, it&#x27;s called background radiation : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Background_radiation#:~:text=Background%20radiation%20is%20a%20measure,deliberate%20introduction%20of%20radiation%20sources" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Background_radiation#:~:text=B...</a>. A scientific article without any reference to measurements or at least a comparison with background radiation is criticisable. I&#x27;ll say the obvious but, it the legal limit is near to the background radiation level, all became not safe. Anyway, what about the truffles and other mushrooms of that region ? For logic deduction, they should be unsafe, too.
评论 #37354591 未加载
评论 #37363837 未加载
boxed超过 1 年前
I just by default doubt any anti-nuclear thing that comes out of Germany.<p>We do not need Germanys CO2 emissions. That&#x27;s the big problem here. And the amount of radioactivity spewed into the atmosphere by German coal plants is way bigger than cold war era weapon testing.
评论 #37351189 未加载
评论 #37351120 未加载
评论 #37351347 未加载
评论 #37351071 未加载
评论 #37351248 未加载
评论 #37351133 未加载
Symmetry超过 1 年前
It would be helpful to get some numbers as to how radioactive this boar meat is. Bacon is a known minor carcinogen, would bacon made from these boars be 100 times as carcinogenic as normal bacon? 1% more?
评论 #37353655 未加载
ngcc_hk超过 1 年前
Don’t know some German wild boar is so dangerous to eat. Is there other area and other animal like that.
评论 #37353638 未加载
exabrial超过 1 年前
Once again: from a weapons program, _not_ a power generation program... yet power generation gets all the flak and are currently being torn down in Germany, while... they still have nuclear weapons.
评论 #37354828 未加载
bigfryo超过 1 年前
Keep pumping out that scare propaganda
dvh超过 1 年前
Are wild boards from neighboring countries immune?
mschuster91超过 1 年前
In case you wonder just what happens to all the dead pigs the hunters shoot each year (about 100k&#x2F;a): the fat ends up as biodiesel, the carcasses are burnt to power cement plants and waste incinerators [1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.augsburger-allgemeine.de&#x2F;bayern&#x2F;Augsburg-Entsorgung-von-verstrahltem-Wild-Nuklear-Schweine-in-Diesel-id24418196.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.augsburger-allgemeine.de&#x2F;bayern&#x2F;Augsburg-Entsorg...</a>
评论 #37351218 未加载
progrus超过 1 年前
Anyone who eats pork anyway should have no problem with this meat either.<p>This sounds like grasping at straws, a last-ditch effort to scare the not-so-easily-persuadable-anymore into opposing modern power development with nuclear fission.<p>And here is your yearly reminder that Friends of the Earth was founded with a donation from Robert Orville Anderson, an oil baron: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Friends_of_the_Earth_(US)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Friends_of_the_Earth_(US)</a>
评论 #37353693 未加载
seanhunter超过 1 年前
I surely can&#x27;t be the only one who hears &quot;radioactive boar&quot; and thinks &quot;superhero origin story&quot;.
评论 #37356516 未加载