TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Don’t Pay for 95% (2016)

2 点作者 rognjen超过 1 年前

3 条评论

avidiax超过 1 年前
&gt; Yet we consumers love to envision the maximum usage for a particular item – like a house or a car – then buy the item with a capacity high enough to accommodate our visions.<p>It&#x27;s one step worse for houses. Even a single person should buy a &quot;starter home&quot; with 3 bedrooms in a good school district. Why? Not because the single person wants it, but merely because home buyers are encouraged to think that this makes the house easier to sell later, and even single buyers like yourself will not want an unsellable house.
whelp_24超过 1 年前
I would like to see numbers. I can&#x27;t imagine this is actually any cheaper but it is less flexible.
评论 #37360370 未加载
not_your_vase超过 1 年前
<p><pre><code> You will own nothing and be happy.</code></pre>