I don't disagree with the post, though its content is of low quality. I think modern PHP is an okay language for the web, and that it will stay there for a long time — mostly because many old projects will keep using it. But I can't envision a bright and expanding future for PHP.<p>The irony is that the post claims "the Internet runs on PHP. The evidence is overwhelming." and cites companies... that have moved away from PHP. As far as I know, Facebook doesn't use PHP anymore. There also a link to Slack, that migrated to Hack[^1], a language which started as a fork of PHP but is now quite different.<p>As for the first argument of the page, statistics from W3Tech, the number of PHP sites is mostly a consequence of a few widespread PHP CMS, like Wordpress. It's not a sign that new PHP code is written or even that development in these CMS is still going strong.<p>In the section "Anecdotes", the reference to "the enormous lead" according to ArsTechnica is junk: ArsTechnica's text is just a comment on the W3Tech report mentioned above, it brings nothing new.<p>In the "PHP at scale" section, I don't deny that it's possible to do so, but if Facebook and Slack moved away from PHP, it's probably because programs with other languages scale better. In Wikipedia's infrastructure, there are some custom extensions[^2] (compiled plugins for PHP written in C). The right question is not "Can it scale?" but "Is it easy to scale?". In my experience, handling hundreds of concurrent connections (online exams) with Moodle (a PHP Learning CMS) required much more resources than we expected. Laravel can scale, but I guess scale problems would appear much later with some alternatives.<p>[^1]: <a href="https://slack.engineering/hacklang-at-slack-a-better-php/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://slack.engineering/hacklang-at-slack-a-better-php/</a><p>[^2]: <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/MediaWiki_infrastructure_2022.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/MediaWik...</a>