I wonder if they'd settle for a (retroactive relatively) reduction in CEO Pay, coupled by an increase of at least the CEO's pay increase or better relative to the last contract period.<p>## HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE ##<p>+ Prior to contract CEO made 10,000,000 per year. Since then they (currently) make 14,000,000 per year.<p>+ Union is asking for 40% increase to match CEO's increase.<p>? Would the union accept CEO's total compensation package, including retroactive to cover the same period, decrease to E.G. 20% (CEO now makes 12,000,000 per year in this hypothetical) with a union member INCREASE of 20% or greater (possibly including a one time contract signing bonus to cover the back period)?