MSN Publishes AI Generated Obituary for Former NBA Player

What baffles me is how this was published. Which human at MSN didn&#x27;t read this before putting it out there?<p>I feel sure in saying that someone had the chance to read it but didn&#x27;t... but the idea that it was published automatically after being prompted is so bad that I&#x27;m struggling to find words for it. It&#x27;s like having a workplace near-miss because someone set up industrial equipment wrong. It&#x27;s like a comedy prequel to Terminator that shows how Skynet was born. It&#x27;s like turning your bread to ash because you set your toaster to the wrong setting and stepped outside.

Oh dear.<p>If there were no humans that reviewed this article and it was generated and published automatically and unattended, then it shows that not only AI systems can&#x27;t be trusted, you still need at least 1 journalist to supervise and review the AI generated page <i>before</i> it gets published.<p>This is why fully replacing <i>all</i> humans with AI in lets say journalism won&#x27;t happen anytime soon with rubbish like this although for sure there will be less human journalists needed.<p>But even worse if a human reviewed it and published this anyway. But again we don&#x27;t know for sure.

The archived MSN article in question: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;jKJHn" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;jKJHn</a>

I have a hard time believing GPT4 would come out with anything that bad, which really makes me wonder which model they used...<p>Edit: answer is in the article, kind of...:<p>&quot;In this case, the content was generated through a combination of algorithmic techniques with human review, not a large language model or AI system.&quot;

Since the structure of the TMZ article and the MSN article is almost the same, I think the writer named Race Track used Copilot or ChatGPT to change the expression to plagiarize. As a result, the word &quot;dead&quot; was converted to &quot;useless.&quot;