TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

C++Builder 11 Community Edition

96 点作者 DaOne256超过 1 年前

10 条评论

marcodiego超过 1 年前
My main problem with delphi: it is &quot;too proprietary&quot;. It was a very productive IDE in the 90&#x27;s or early 2000&#x27;s but lost their path and never recovered.<p>Some new versions broke compatibility with previous version&#x27;s components. There was the case where you paid a good amount of money on some proprietary components and they simply wouldn&#x27;t work in the next version: you were imprisoned in an obsolete IDE. By not being multi-platform (I heard it improved lately) you could only use it with&#x2F;for win32 so it lost servers, embedded, cloud and mobile. By not being open-source nobody could improve it.<p>Then it had to compete with &quot;native tools&quot;. Whoever develops for windows wouldn&#x27;t quit ms&#x27; tools to use it, whoever develops for mac wouldn&#x27;t quit apple&#x27;s tools to use it, whoever develops for android wouldn&#x27;t quit google&#x27;s tools to use it, whoever develops for linux was mostly ignored after kylix.<p>Note that I didn&#x27;t even mentioned price and license.<p>They improved it later, I heard. But seems more like the old case of too little too late. Most successful programming languages today are open source and multi-platform. Delphi was dependent on win32 for too long and it still is &quot;too proprietary&quot;. You do the world a favor by porting your project to lazarus.
评论 #37522820 未加载
评论 #37524003 未加载
评论 #37524389 未加载
评论 #37524336 未加载
评论 #37530076 未加载
blinkingled超过 1 年前
Borland&#x27;s C++ compiler was _fast_. And I mean eye wateringly fast on crappy pre-AMD64 hardware. I wonder if it supports modern C++ today and is still faster than other compilers. (If I am not mistaken this new edition is a offshoot of that?)<p>(Yeah I am not downloading the &quot;Community&quot; edition if I have to provide my name address and phone number. Really if your product needs mindshare and you offer community edition the least you can do is make it easily downloadable.)
评论 #37522273 未加载
评论 #37524940 未加载
评论 #37523103 未加载
评论 #37528066 未加载
评论 #37530086 未加载
评论 #37522192 未加载
评论 #37525097 未加载
pjmlp超过 1 年前
The only VB like development experience for C++.<p>Microsoft completely messed up the XAML &#x2F; C++&#x2F;CX development experience with internal politics, only to have the team responsible for C++&#x2F;WinRT going on to have fun in Rust&#x2F;WinRT, leaving the former in maintenance state.
评论 #37521617 未加载
评论 #37521704 未加载
评论 #37526113 未加载
cfn超过 1 年前
You can only use this edition if you make less than 5000 USD and&#x2F;or have less than 5 devs. If you do, licenses start at 1000 USD per year. Assuming a commercial app, of course.
评论 #37522152 未加载
aetherspawn超过 1 年前
Does this support macOS for apps? The website is a little unclear and “Windows and iOS” is a really odd combination of platform support.<p>Aside, I have used this in the past for GUI on windows and it was amazing. Like .NET but native and better.
DaOne256超过 1 年前
See also: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37520504">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37520504</a>
nurettin超过 1 年前
The &quot;community edition&quot; version of delphi had no visual editor, no way to build a bpl and it was 32bit only. I don&#x27;t know thos c++11 compiler&#x27;s features, it isn&#x27;t immediately apparent in the mobile site.
matt3210超过 1 年前
Why this instead of clion?
评论 #37525083 未加载
coliveira超过 1 年前
The main problem with Borland C++ is that it is still a 32bit compiler.
评论 #37522392 未加载
评论 #37522510 未加载
评论 #37525213 未加载
评论 #37524593 未加载
评论 #37525919 未加载
phendrenad2超过 1 年前
I understand why there isn&#x27;t a Mac version, but it&#x27;s still a bit disappointing.