TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Outdoor Cats and Epistemology

2 点作者 OmarShehata超过 1 年前

3 条评论

uberman超过 1 年前
The contrarian is not wrong, but neither is the OP. At least from my perspective.<p>When we moved to our current semi rural property there were birds and squirrels even flying squirrels all over. Our property is a ranch but out house sits in a woodlot.<p>Then a new neighbor moved in next door. I use that term loosely, but close enough that their 3 outdoor cats were frequent visitors. Now we have no squirrels but we also have very few birds that visit.<p>I did not mind the squirrels aside from thier attempts to get in the house. Before our new neighbor we would pay a trapper to come get them a few times a year. Since the cats though we no longer see any squirrels or chipmunks at all.
h2odragon超过 1 年前
&gt; I think they BOTH have reasonable ways of finding truth.<p>I disagree. One party has obviously decided to substitute &quot;authority&quot; for thought; which is not conducive to civilized co-existence with anyone who even interprets the Authority differently, much less with anyone who actually disagrees.<p>Finding an external force that you think is always right and cannot disagree with isn&#x27;t a &quot;reasonable way of finding Truth&quot;; its <i>religion</i> where Truth is just Revealed to you.
neodymiumphish超过 1 年前
I find it very interesting that the anti-outdoor-cat arguer had nothing to say of the fact that the humans inhabiting the same area are also an &quot;invasive species&quot; heavily impacting the relevant ecosystem. To me it doesn&#x27;t really seem like something that matters, assuming the cats are neutered.<p>Props to the pro-outdoor-cat arguer for not devolving to the same negative attitude brought on by the anti- arguer.
评论 #37535675 未加载