TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to Escape the Startup Trough of Sorrow

85 点作者 Vagantem超过 1 年前

5 条评论

vonnik超过 1 年前
This article does not really apply to startups’ trough of sorrow, at least not most of the startups trying to sell something new. It reads like it applies to consumer goods that are in crowded markets.<p>Most startups’ problem is they often don’t have any customers at all, and don’t know how to find them. Many of them started with a tech solution and went searching for a problem.
评论 #37538985 未加载
Vagantem超过 1 年前
Author here - thank you all for reading. Happy to discuss any points in the article and answer any questions. Also, feel free to check out the other articles in the series!
评论 #37538130 未加载
评论 #37537465 未加载
评论 #37538801 未加载
评论 #37540178 未加载
dangus超过 1 年前
In addition to the 4 Cs of marketing, I would look at Porter&#x27;s 5 forces and make an industry analysis:<p>Competitive Rivalry<p>Supplier Power<p>Buyer Power<p>Threat of Substitution<p>Threat of New Entry<p>(There&#x27;s also a sixth force, complementary products)<p>I think these also tie in nicely with an analysis of where the best profit pools exist within the value chain. Apple makes more profit selling an iPhone than Foxconn because its position in the value chain has a more favorable 5 forces situation: a much lower threat of substitution, lower supplier&#x2F;buyer power, lower threat of new entry etc.<p>You can have great brand positioning and never make a dime. Example: Uber. A dominant brand with universal recognition, which has done nothing but lose money. They&#x27;ll never make money because their supplier power, buyer power, and threat of substitution are impossibly high. They&#x27;re caught between their suppliers&#x27; (drivers&#x27;) price demands and their buyers&#x27; (riders&#x27;) prices sensitivity.
评论 #37543489 未加载
pedalpete超过 1 年前
Interesting read. I&#x27;d be curious to see examples of companies that change their positioning every 5 years, vs those that are able to nail a long-term position.<p>Your example of &quot;Enjoy the silence&quot; sounds more like a tagline than a positioning statement.<p>This is so easy to also get confused with Mission statements.<p>I was thinking &quot;Organizing the world&#x27;s information&quot; was Google&#x27;s positioning statement, but that&#x27;s their mission statement.<p>Other articles get this confused as well [1]. From what I understand, the positioning statement should be more of a &quot;for [customer] we [do the thing] so they can [be the person]&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;brandstruck.co&#x2F;blog-post&#x2F;positioning-three-valuable-brands-world&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;brandstruck.co&#x2F;blog-post&#x2F;positioning-three-valuable-...</a>
评论 #37538951 未加载
mellosouls超过 1 年前
(Very) OT: I would hazard a guess the striking phrase in the title originates (indirectly if not intentionally by the author) from &quot;Slough of Despond&quot; in <i>The Pilgrim&#x27;s Progress</i> by John Bunyan.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Slough_of_Despond" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Slough_of_Despond</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gutenberg.org&#x2F;ebooks&#x2F;131" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gutenberg.org&#x2F;ebooks&#x2F;131</a>
评论 #37539006 未加载
评论 #37538784 未加载