TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How to discover new and interesting papers?

30 点作者 drsim超过 1 年前
I’ve recently gotten into reading scholarly papers, prompted by some very accessible and engaging papers about LLMs.<p>Most of these are hosted at arXiv which has a new function, but no ranking.<p>I’d love to discover interesting papers in the fields I follow, ranked by the community. Much like HN.<p>Does this exist? How do others keep up to date in their fields?

9 条评论

evolve2k超过 1 年前
I often use semantic scholar (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semanticscholar.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.semanticscholar.org</a>) as my first place to search on new topics.<p>Once you get the search results up you can then refine and sort by: relevancy, recency as well as “citation count” and “most influential papers”.<p>The later I find especially useful when exploring a new topic.<p>They have a login account but to be honest I haven’t really explored what that offers. Anyone have an account and finding that useful?
评论 #37550110 未加载
strangecasts超过 1 年前
For fields where ArXiv preprints are the norm, Arxiv-Sanity [1] allows filtering by keywords and basic topic filtering.<p>In ML, I personally like skimming Davis Blalock&#x27;s Davis Summarizes Papers [2].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv-sanity-lite.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv-sanity-lite.com&#x2F;</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dblalock.substack.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dblalock.substack.com&#x2F;</a>
austinjp超过 1 年前
Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you&#x27;re logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I&#x27;ve not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they&#x27;re based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you&#x27;ll need both&#x2F;one of those for it to work.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.google.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.google.com</a><p>Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty of people dislike). You&#x27;ll need to create an account, and I don&#x27;t know if non-academic accounts have the same access as academic ones. It has a new &quot;researcher discovery&quot; function I&#x27;ve not used so again can&#x27;t vouch for its quality. You can set up various alerts apparently, although again I&#x27;ve not used them.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scopus.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scopus.com</a><p>If an author is registered on ORCID you can check their works, but it doesn&#x27;t appear that anything like RSS feeds are available, unfortunately. Plenty of journals have RSS feeds, but you&#x27;ll have to hunt them down yourself.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orcid.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orcid.org</a><p>Finally, you might want to check out other platforms and preprint servers, which might have better alerts etc. Try OSF, which hosts a bunch of preprint servers, and also provides hosting for documents and files that accompany published papers. However, it looks like there isn&#x27;t much comp-sci stuff on there.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;osf.io" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;osf.io</a><p>I guess you could have a look at figshare.com too for similar reasons.
vlmutolo超过 1 年前
I’ve used Litmaps[0] to discover new papers in a field. They have an interesting “discover” mode where you input papers you consider to be “relevant” and they try to suggest other papers you’d think are relevant.<p>If you subscribe to their service, they’ll even notify you when new papers come out that you’d consider relevant.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.litmaps.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.litmaps.com&#x2F;</a>
rewmie超过 1 年前
As for ranks, one of the main metrics is citations. Keywords are also relevant. Once you are up to speed on a topic then you&#x27;ll notice a few publications tend to publish the good stuff, and so subscribing to them helps you feed off the paper firehouse.<p>arXiv might be a source but hosting only preprints without peer review ends up lowering the average quality of the stuff that shows up in there.
jrod16超过 1 年前
You can use a service like usedigest.com and add in RSS feeds of specific sources related to scholarly papers. Then you’ll get a personalized newsletter with that content every day. I’ve been using it to keep track of top posts on HN and Reddit lately and it’s a huge time saver.
astrocato超过 1 年前
Check out dailyacademia.com. It delivers a daily digest of new publications from arXiv based on your interests. I&#x27;ve set up a promo code &quot;hackernews&quot; for a free one-year subscription.
janalsncm超过 1 年前
Look into Papers With Code. It has a section on state of the art which contains papers on all sorts of ML tasks and the models which are best at that task.
py4超过 1 年前
aside from sources mentioned by others (arxiv-sanity-lite, newsletter): 1. deep learning monitor: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;deeplearn.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;deeplearn.org</a> 2. Following folks on Twitter and then Twitter recommendation algo will take care of the rest